| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床口腔医学杂志|数字化口腔修复(8)--CAD镜像修复上颌前牙形态的视觉评价

数字化口腔修复(8)--CAD镜像修复上颌前牙形态的视觉评价

李瑞莺 姚江武

临床口腔医学杂志2016,Vol.32Issue(4):245-247,248,4.
临床口腔医学杂志2016,Vol.32Issue(4):245-247,248,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2016.04.019

数字化口腔修复(8)--CAD镜像修复上颌前牙形态的视觉评价

Digital restorative dentistry and prosthodontics (8)--Visual evaluationof restoration in maxillary incisorby CAD mirror-image

李瑞莺 1姚江武2

作者信息

  • 1. 福建医科大学口腔医学院 福建 福州 350002
  • 2. 厦门医学院口腔医院 福建 厦门 361001
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study was tocomparesimilarity of virtual image of the restoration maxillary in-cisor with all ceramic crown by CEREC®CAD mirror-image (MI) model and biogenericreconstruction (BR) model as well as manual wax-ups(WU). Method:Thirtyparticipants with intactdentitions,symmetric incisors andnormal occlusal morphol-ogy were includedrandomly. Impressions,biteregistrationsand three gypsum replicas were made.Preparationsof one of the max-illary incisor on modelfor all ceramic crowns were performed andscanned.The virtual imageof restorations were formed by us-ing the modes of MI and BR(CEREC®v4.2).WU of these preparationswere scanned as well.Differences were evaluated vi-suallyby matching the virtual images ofscan with the contralateraltooth morphologies. The discrepancieswere compared a-monggroups of MI,BR,andWU viaWilcoxon signed-rank test (α=0.05). Result:The groups of MI and WU got higher scoresthan that of BR(P <0.05),but no significant discrepancies were found between MI and WU (P >0.05). Conclusion:The CAD-MIand manual WUareall suitable techniquesin aestheticalrestoration of anterior teeth , but the former is more effi-cient than the latter.

关键词

计算机辅助设计/镜像/生物再造/视觉评价

Key words

CAD/Mirror-image/Biogenericreconstruction/Visual evaluation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李瑞莺,姚江武..数字化口腔修复(8)--CAD镜像修复上颌前牙形态的视觉评价[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2016,32(4):245-247,248,4.

临床口腔医学杂志

OACSTPCD

1003-1634

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文