| 注册
首页|期刊导航|渭南师范学院学报|论《史记》与《汉书》选录游侠形象的错位--兼谈太史公和班固的史学思想差异

论《史记》与《汉书》选录游侠形象的错位--兼谈太史公和班固的史学思想差异

严振南

渭南师范学院学报2016,Vol.31Issue(5):22-27,6.
渭南师范学院学报2016,Vol.31Issue(5):22-27,6.

论《史记》与《汉书》选录游侠形象的错位--兼谈太史公和班固的史学思想差异

The Misplacement of Paladin’ s Characters in Historical Records and History of Han Dynasty---Additionally Discussing Differences of Historical Consciousness between Sima Qian and Ban Gu

严振南1

作者信息

  • 1. 广西民族大学 文学院,南宁530000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Sima Qian believed that the“paladin” was a symbol of justice and a kind of supplement? to the lack of national jus⁃tice. Sima Qian looked forward to a special external force burst the hierarchical system maintain social justice.The paladin’s charac⁃teristics of force let him become an executor of justice. In order to maintain individual life, Sima Qian stressed? paladin’ s force and the spirits of sacrifice themselves to protect others. In order to maintain the national order, Ban Gu intended to confuse the concept?between morality, justice and violence, and highlighted the violence? of paladin, and his aim is to restrain its development.

关键词

游侠/道义/豪暴之侠/抑侠

Key words

paladin/chivalrous/violent/restrain the development of paladin

分类

社会科学

引用本文复制引用

严振南..论《史记》与《汉书》选录游侠形象的错位--兼谈太史公和班固的史学思想差异[J].渭南师范学院学报,2016,31(5):22-27,6.

渭南师范学院学报

OACHSSCD

1009-5128

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文