医学信息2016，Vol.29Issue(9)：73-74,75,3.
三种方法检测尿红细胞、白细胞结果比较
Comparison of Three Methods for Detecting Urine RBC and WBC
陈泽琴 1李彬2
作者信息
- 1. 四川省内江市威远县中医医院，四川 威远 642450
- 2. 四川省自贡市第四人民医院，四川 自贡 643000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To investigate the differences among the urine dry chemical analyzer Changchun DIRUI H-800, urine sediment analyzer Sysmex UF-500i and microscopic checking urine red blood cells (WBC), white blood cells (RBC). Methods Urine red blood cells ,white blood cell of 680 patients were detected by urine analyzer and microscope at the same,and the results were compared and analyzed. Results The positive rate of the urine dry chemical analyzer Changchun DIRUI H-800 is 24.85%,the positive rate of urine sediment analyzer Sysmex UF-500i is 27.35% and that of artificial microscopy is 25.5%.the urine red blood cell microscopic examination and urine sediment analyzer χ² is 4.09, ( <0.05) are statistically significant.microscopic examination of urine white blood cell and dry chemical analyzerχ² is 26.18,the difference of ( <0.05) have statistical significance.And the difference of ( >0.05) in microscopic examination of urine red blood cells and dry chemical analyzer, urine white blood cell microscopy and urine sediment analyzer is not statistically significant.Conclusion Urine analyzer can detect the white blood cells and red blood cells in urine quickly.But there are some false negative and false positive,which should be combined with manual microscopic examination to ensure the accuracy of the results.关键词
尿液干化学仪长春迪瑞H-800/尿液沉渣仪Sysmex UF-500i/手工镜检/红细胞/白细胞Key words
Urine dry chemistry analyzer Changchun DIRUI H-800/Urine sediment analyzer Sysmex UF-500i/Manual microscopy/Red blood cells/White blood cells引用本文复制引用
陈泽琴,李彬..三种方法检测尿红细胞、白细胞结果比较[J].医学信息,2016,29(9):73-74,75,3.
