| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中华灾害救援医学|不同预后积分系统在骨髓增生异常综合征预后评估中的对比

不同预后积分系统在骨髓增生异常综合征预后评估中的对比

王薇 吴广胜

中华灾害救援医学2016,Vol.4Issue(4):199-202,4.
中华灾害救援医学2016,Vol.4Issue(4):199-202,4.DOI:10.13919/j.issn.2095-6274.2016.04.006

不同预后积分系统在骨髓增生异常综合征预后评估中的对比

Comparative study on different prognostic scoring system in prognosis evaluation of myelodysplastic syndrome

王薇 1吴广胜2

作者信息

  • 1. 832000,新疆维吾尔自治区石河子大学医学院临床医学系
  • 2. 832000,新疆维吾尔自治区石河子大学医学院第一附属医院血液风湿科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To explore the significance among different scoring systems in predicting the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), to guide the clinical accurate prognosis stratification and personal treatment.Methods The clinical data of 72 patients with newly diagnosed MDS were retrospectively reviewed, the prognosis was evaluated according to international prostate symptom score (IPSS), World Health Organization classification-based prognostic scoring system (WPSS) and revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R). Results The difference of median survival time between different groups of prognostic scoring system was statistically significant (Tarone-Ware=9.572-19.834,P<0.05). The survival curve of WPSS had more intersections between each group, IPSS-R prognosis had less intersections. For low risk group, prognostic evaluation of IPSS and WPSS were poor, IPSS-R was the best way to predict the prognosis. Correlation between IPSS and IPSS-R was the strongest (rs=0.765,P<0.05).Conclusions All the three scoring systems can better predict the prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed MDS, and IPSS-R has more advantages. Integrated using 3 scoring system in clinical work is more favorable for clinical prognosis evaluation of MDS.

关键词

骨髓增生异常综合征/预后积分系统/生存分析

Key words

myelodysplastic syndrome/prognostic scoring system/survival analysis

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王薇,吴广胜..不同预后积分系统在骨髓增生异常综合征预后评估中的对比[J].中华灾害救援医学,2016,4(4):199-202,4.

基金项目

石河子大学医学院第一附属医院院级课题 ()

中华灾害救援医学

2095-6274

访问量5
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文