口腔疾病防治2016，Vol.24Issue(6)：349-351,3.DOI:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.06.007
自锁托槽与双翼托槽滑动法关闭间隙的临床比较
Clinical comparison of space closure with sliding mechanism between self ligating bracket and twin brackets
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the the rate of en⁃masse space closure with sliding mechanics between 3M Smart⁃Clip self⁃ligating brackets and 3M Gemini MBT twin brackets in the first premolar extraction patients. Methods 20 Class I malocclusion patients who need first premolar extraction treatment were selected. One arch side of the second pre⁃molar and first molar were bonded with 3M self⁃ligating brackets and the other side bonded with Gemini MBT twin brack⁃ets. After leveling and alignment, 0.48 mm × 0.64 mm (0.019 inch × 0.025 inch) stainless steel wire and nickel titanium coil springs were used to close the space. An average rate of space closure per month (mm/month) was calculated in each side. Results The median rates of tooth movement for the SmartClip bracket side (1.03 mm per month) and the Gemini MBT twin brackets side (1.00 mm per month) were not significantly different (t=0.70, P=0.48). Conclusion There was no significant difference in the rate of en⁃masse space closure between SmartClip brackets and Gemini MBT twin brackets.关键词
自锁托槽/双翼托槽/滑动法/间隙关闭/牙弓Key words
Self-ligating bracket/Twin bracket/Sliding mechanism/Space closure/Dental arch分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
艾毅龙,王增全,张鹏,吴斯媛..自锁托槽与双翼托槽滑动法关闭间隙的临床比较[J].口腔疾病防治,2016,24(6):349-351,3.基金项目
广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目（B2015053）；佛山市科技创新专项资金 （）
