| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国肺癌杂志|ChART回顾性数据库局部进展期胸腺瘤的术前诱导治疗效果分析

ChART回顾性数据库局部进展期胸腺瘤的术前诱导治疗效果分析

魏煜程 李印 陈克能 陈和忠 刘永煜 崔有斌 王允 庞烈文 于振涛 周鑫明 柳阳春 谷志涛 刘媛 方文涛 沈毅 傅剑华 谭黎杰 张鹏 韩泳涛 陈椿 张仁泉

中国肺癌杂志2016,Vol.19Issue(7):445-452,8.
中国肺癌杂志2016,Vol.19Issue(7):445-452,8.DOI:10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2016.07.06

ChART回顾性数据库局部进展期胸腺瘤的术前诱导治疗效果分析

Preoperative Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced Thymic Tumors:A Retrospective Analysis Using the ChART Database

魏煜程 1李印 2陈克能 3陈和忠 4刘永煜 5崔有斌 6王允 7庞烈文 8于振涛 9周鑫明 10柳阳春 11谷志涛 12刘媛 12方文涛 12沈毅 1傅剑华 13谭黎杰 14张鹏 15韩泳涛 16陈椿 17张仁泉18

作者信息

  • 1. 266001青岛,青岛大学医学院附属医院胸外科
  • 2. 450008郑州,郑州大学附属肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 3. 100142北京,北京大学附肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 4. 200433上海,长海医院胸心外科
  • 5. 110042沈阳,辽宁肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 6. 130021长春,吉林大学附属第一医院胸外科
  • 7. 610041成都,四川大学华西医院胸外科
  • 8. 200032上海,复旦大学附属华山医院胸外科
  • 9. 300060天津,天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院食管癌中心
  • 10. 310022杭州,浙江省肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 11. 330006南昌,江西省人民医院胸外科
  • 12. 200030上海,上海交通大学附属上海胸科医院
  • 13. 510060广州,中山大学附属肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 14. 200032上海,复旦大学附属中山医院胸外科
  • 15. 300052天津,天津医科大学附属总医院胸外科
  • 16. 610041成都,四川省肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 17. 350001福州,福建医科大学附属协和医院胸外科
  • 18. 230022合肥,安徽医科大学附属第一医院胸外科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Background and objectiveTo evaluate the role of preoperative induction therapy on prognosis of local-ly advanced thymic malignancies.MethodsBetween 1994 and 2012, patients received preoperative induction therapies (IT group) in the Chinese Alliance for Research in Thymomas (ChART) database, were compared with those having surgery di-rectly atfer preoperative evaluation (DS group). All tumors receiving induction therapies were locally advanced (clinically stage III-IV) before treatment and those turned out to be in pathological stage I and II were considered downstaged by induction. Clinical pathological characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. To more accurately study the effect of induction therapies, stage IV patients were then excluded. Only stage I-III tumors in the IT group and stage III cases in the DS group were selected for further comparison in a subgroup analysis.Results Only 68 (4%) out of 1,713 patients had induction therapies, with a R0 resection of 67.6%, 5-year recurrence of 44.9%, and 5- and 10-year overall survivals (OS) of 49.7% and 19.9%. Seventeen pa-tients (25%) were downstaged atfer induction. Signiifcantly more thymomas were downstaged than thymic carcinomas (38.7%vs 13.9%,P=0.02). Tumors downstaged atfer induction had signiifcantly higher 5-year OS than those not downstaged (93.8%vs 35.6%,P=0.013). For the subgroup analysis when stage IV patients were excluded, 5-year OS was 85.2% in the DS group and 68.1% in the IT group (P<0.001), although R0 resection were similar (76.4%vs 73.3%,P=0.63). However, 5-year OS in tumors downstaged atfer induction (93.8%) was similar to those in the DS group (85.2%,P=0.438), both signiifcantly higher than those not downstaged atfer induction (35.6%,P<0.001).ConclusionOnly 68 (4%) out of 1,713 patients had induction therapies, with a R0 resection of 67.6%, 5-year recurrence of 44.9%, and 5- and 10-year overall survivals (OS) of 49.7% and 19.9%. Seventeen patients (25%) were downstaged atfer induction. Signiifcantly more thymomas were downstaged than thy-mic carcinomas (38.7%vs 13.9%,P=0.02). Tumors downstaged atfer induction had signiifcantly higher 5-year OS than those not downstaged (93.8%vs 35.6%,P=0.013). For the subgroup analysis when stage IV patients were excluded, 5-year OS was 85.2% in the DS group and 68.1% in the IT group (P<0.001), although R0 resection were similar (76.4%vs 73.3%,P=0.63). However, 5-year OS in tumors downstaged atfer induction (93.8%) was similar to those in the DS group (85.2%,P=0.438), both signiifcantly higher than those not downstaged atfer induction (35.6%,P<0.001).

关键词

局部进展/胸腺瘤/诱导治疗/手术/生存率

Key words

Local progression/Thymic malignancy/Induction therapy/Surgery/Survival

引用本文复制引用

魏煜程,李印,陈克能,陈和忠,刘永煜,崔有斌,王允,庞烈文,于振涛,周鑫明,柳阳春,谷志涛,刘媛,方文涛,沈毅,傅剑华,谭黎杰,张鹏,韩泳涛,陈椿,张仁泉..ChART回顾性数据库局部进展期胸腺瘤的术前诱导治疗效果分析[J].中国肺癌杂志,2016,19(7):445-452,8.

中国肺癌杂志

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCDMEDLINE

1009-3419

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文