| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床骨科杂志|微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病疗效比较

微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病疗效比较

晏雄伟 廉凯 鲁宏 胡杨 周健波

临床骨科杂志2016,Vol.19Issue(3):298-301,4.
临床骨科杂志2016,Vol.19Issue(3):298-301,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2016.03.015

微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病疗效比较

Efficacy camparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ;for treatment of single segment degenerative lumbar disease

晏雄伟 1廉凯 1鲁宏 1胡杨 1周健波1

作者信息

  • 1. 襄阳市中心医院骨科,湖北 襄阳 441021
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare clinical results of minimally transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ( TLIF) and open TLIF for single segment degenerative lumbar disease .Methods All of 97 patients with single segment degener-ative lumbar disease were divided to minimal group (minimally invasive TLIF, n=51) and open group (open TLIF, n=46).These data were compared between the both groups , including operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume , total blood transfusion , back pain ( using visual analogue scale , VAS) , hospital stay , bed time, perioperative complications, clinical function (using the Oswestry disability index, ODI), and radiograph-ic results.Results All of 97 patients were followed up .The follow-up time in minimal group and open group was 28~78 (48.7 ±21.8) months and 27~76 (48.6 ±19.7) months, respectively.The operative time:minimal group (148.8 ±24.2) min, open group (191.7 ±37.6) min (P<0.001);blood loss: minimal group (482.8 ±274.8) ml, open group (787.9 ±264.3)ml (P<0.001);needs of transfusion: minimal group (379.3 ±81.6)ml, open group (619.8 ±237.6) ml (P<0.001);bed time:minimal group (1.3 ±0.8) days, open group (3.1 ±1.6) days (P<0.001);hospital stay:minimal group (4.8 ±1.7) days, open group (11.2 ±3.1) days (P<0.001).At fi-nal follow-up, back pain VAS:minimal group (1.9 ±0.8) points, open group (2.7 ±1.2) points (P<0.001). ODI:minimal group (22.8 ±9.7)%,open group (22.5 ±11.6)%( P>0.05);the rate of screw malposition:mini-mal group 3.4%, open group 2.2% ( P>0.05 );the rate of cage shift: minimal group 3.9%, open group 2.2%(P>0.05);loss value of intervertebral height: minimal group (1.3 ±0.6) mm, open group (1.5 ±0.7) mm (P>0.05);and the rate of interbody fusion:minimal group 94.1%, open group 95.7%(P>0.05).Conclusions For the single segment degenerative lumbar disease , the use of minimally invasive TLIF or open TLIF , can obtain satisfactory clinical function and radiographic results , but the former has the advantage of less invasive , shorter length of hospital stay and bed stay ,and lighter residual back pain .

关键词

腰椎退变性疾病/外科手术,微创性/开放手术/后路腰椎间融合

Key words

degenerative lumbar disease/surgical procedures ,minimally invasive/open operation/posterior lumbar in-terbody fusion

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

晏雄伟,廉凯,鲁宏,胡杨,周健波..微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2016,19(3):298-301,4.

临床骨科杂志

OACSTPCD

1008-0287

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文