医学信息2016，Vol.29Issue(15)：95-96,2.
锁定钢板与外固定支架结合锁定钢板治疗C3型桡骨远端骨折的临床比较研究
Clinical Comparative Study of Locking Compression Plate and External Fixation Combined with Locking Compression Plate in the Treatment of Type C3 Distal Radius Fractures
蒋允昌 1冯虎 1袁峰 1郭开今1
作者信息
- 1. 徐州医学院附属医院骨科，江苏 徐州 221002
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between locking compression plate and external fixation combined with locking compression plate in the treatment of type C3 distal radius fractures. Methods From August 2006 to October 2010, 49 patients with type C3 distal radius fractures were fixed with locking compression plate (group A) and external fixator combined with locking compression plate (group B). Appropriate bone grafting were applied according to the condition of bone defect. The effects of two groups were compared with VAS score, modified Gartland and Werley (GW) score and Batra radiology score. Results All patients were followed up for 8to 26 months(average 12.3 months).All fractures united in 3 to 6 months (average 4.2 months).Among 24 cases of group A, GW score: 16 cases were excellent , 4 cases good, 4 cases fair; Batra radiological score: 14 cases were excellent, 8 cases good, 2 cases fair. Among 25 cases of group B, GW score: 22 cases were excellent , 3 cases good; Batra radiological score: 23 cases were excellent, 2 cases good. Conclusion For the type C3 distal radius fractures,The two methods can achieve satisfactory clinical results. However,external fixation combined with locking compression plate can achieve a higher anatomical reduction rate and clinical excellent rate than simple locking plate fixation.关键词
桡骨骨折/骨折固定术/内固定/外固定器/锁定加压钢板Key words
Radius fracture/Fracture fixation/Internal fixation/External fixator/Locking compression plate引用本文复制引用
蒋允昌,冯虎,袁峰,郭开今..锁定钢板与外固定支架结合锁定钢板治疗C3型桡骨远端骨折的临床比较研究[J].医学信息,2016,29(15):95-96,2.
