西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）2016，Vol.18Issue(4)：47-53,7.DOI:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2016.04.14.05
信托受托人亲自管理义务的规范模式比较与选择
Regulation Patterns of Trustee’s Liability for Handling the Trust Affairs in Person Comparison and Choice
摘要
Abstract
There are two typical regulation patterns of trustee’s liability in comparative law. The America’s duty of prudent administration entrusts broad discretionary powers to trustee to decide whether or not to delegate an agent to deal with trust affairs,and regulates that the trustee is applied to fault liability if he or she breaches personal duty of administration,and encourages an agent to deal with trust affairs. In contrast,the regulation pattern of power of delegation in Japan entrusts limited discretionary powers to the trustee for delegating an agent to deal with trust affairs,and regulates that the trustee is liable for strict liability if he or she breaches personal duty of administration,which shows that Japan restricts the powers of trustee to delegate an agent to deal with trust affairs. The America’s duty of prudent administration is in the maximum interests of the beneficiaries and in compliance with the essence of personal administration of the trustee. However,China’s trust law strictly restricts the agent in deal with trust affairs,which is inappropriate. It is advisable for China to improve the principle of personal administration of the trustee by learning from America’s duty of prudent administration.关键词
受托人/亲自管理义务/谨慎义务/委托权/规范模式Key words
trustee/dutyofpersonaladministration/prudentduty/power of delegation/regulationpattern分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
姚朝兵..信托受托人亲自管理义务的规范模式比较与选择[J].西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）,2016,18(4):47-53,7.基金项目
贵州民族大学引进人才科研基金资助项目“第三方支付服务的信托法规制研究”（15XRY001）。 （）
