| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床医学工程|宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效对比

宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效对比

罗敏

临床医学工程2016,Vol.23Issue(7):901-902,2.
临床医学工程2016,Vol.23Issue(7):901-902,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2016.07.0901

宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效对比

Effect Comparison of LEEP and CKC in Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasias

罗敏1

作者信息

  • 1. 广东省河源市妇幼保健院妇产科,广东河源517000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cold knife conization (CKC) in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN). Methods 80 CIN patients treated in our hospital from July 2011 to July 2012 were selected and equally divided into control group and study group. The study group was treated with LEEP, the control group was treated with CKC. The clinical effects and complications in two groups were observed and compared. Results The healing time of incision and operation time in study group was shorter than those in control group (P<0.05), the intraoperative bleeding volume was less than that in control group (P <0.05). The coincidence rate of preoperative biopsy and postoperative pathology, droop rate of CIN grades, incidence of invasive carcinoma, positive rate of surgical margins in two groups had no statistical difference (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative cervical adhesion in study group was lower than that in control group (P<0.05). Conclusions LEEP in treatment of CIN has the advantages of less complications, simple operation, less bleeding volume, quick wound healing and low recurrence rate, which is worthy of promotion in clinic.

关键词

宫颈环形电切术/宫颈上皮内瘤变/冷刀锥切术/疗效

Key words

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure/Cervical intraepithelial neoplasias/Cold knife conization/Curative effect

分类

临床医学

引用本文复制引用

罗敏..宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的疗效对比[J].临床医学工程,2016,23(7):901-902,2.

临床医学工程

1674-4659

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文