医学信息2016，Vol.29Issue(20)：38-39,2.
“狼和”包皮环切吻合器与传统包皮环切术的临床疗效对比研究（附494例）
Comparative Study on Clinical Efficacy between Langhe Circumcision Suture Device and Conventional Circumcision:Analysis of 494 Cases
代晓飞 1崔亮 1张讯 1靖万林 1韩旭 1孙晓俊 1李景敏1
作者信息
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between Langhe circumcision suture device and conventional circumcision. Methods Patients with redundant prepuce and phimosis were divided into disposable circumcision suture device group (n=324) and conventional circumcision group (n=170) according to the odd or even of the hospitalizing time. We observed the surgical duration, blood loss, intraoperative pain score, postoperative 24h pain score, wound healing time, postoperative satisfaction and complications between the two groups. Results The surgical duration, blood loss, intraoperative pain score, postoperative 24h pain score, wound healing time, postoperative satisfaction and complications were (8.30±1.12)min, (1.05±0.60)ml, 1.10±0.45, 2.31±0.74,(7.2±2.2)d, 97.8% and 1.5% in the disposable circumcision suture device group as compare with (23.21±3.43)min, (5.62±3.21)ml, 3.35±1.62, 5.08±1.80, (9.1±1.8)d, 91.2% and 3.5% in the conventional group respectively. Differences are statistically significant ( <0.05) in these parameters. Conclusion Compared with the conventional procedure, the disposable circumcision suture divice has the advantages of shorter operation time, minimally invasive, mild pain, fewer complications and higher satisfaction.关键词
包皮环切吻合器/包皮环切术/包皮过长/包茎Key words
Circumcision suture device/Circumcision/Redundant prepuce/Phimosis引用本文复制引用
代晓飞,崔亮,张讯,靖万林,韩旭,孙晓俊,李景敏..“狼和”包皮环切吻合器与传统包皮环切术的临床疗效对比研究（附494例）[J].医学信息,2016,29(20):38-39,2.
