| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国社区医师|无保护会阴接生法与保护会阴接生法的临床应用比较

无保护会阴接生法与保护会阴接生法的临床应用比较

李其香

中国社区医师2016,Vol.32Issue(21):170-170,172,2.
中国社区医师2016,Vol.32Issue(21):170-170,172,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2016.21.106

无保护会阴接生法与保护会阴接生法的临床应用比较

Clinical application comparison of delivery method without perineal protection and delivery method with peri-neal protection

李其香1

作者信息

  • 1. 401220重庆市长寿区人民医院
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To explore the clinical application of delivery method without perineal protection and delivery method with perineal protection.Methods:87 delivery women were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group.The experimental group was given delivery method without perineal protection.The control group was given delivery method with perineal protection.We compared the outcome of childbirth and maternal condition.Results:In the experimental group,the rate of Ⅰ degree perineal laceration was higher than that in the control group;Ⅱ degree and Ⅲ degree laceration rate and the rate of perineal infection and edema were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion:The delivery method without perineal protection can reduce maternal injury and the rate of perineal injury.The effect is significant.

关键词

保护会阴接生法/无保护会阴接生法/临床效果

Key words

Delivery method with perineal protection/Delivery method without perineal protection/Clinical effect

引用本文复制引用

李其香..无保护会阴接生法与保护会阴接生法的临床应用比较[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(21):170-170,172,2.

中国社区医师

1007-614X

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文