| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国中医药图书情报杂志|论《本草纲目》与《本草备要》版本体例之异同

论《本草纲目》与《本草备要》版本体例之异同

邓勇 程新 黄辉

中国中医药图书情报杂志2016,Vol.40Issue(4):48-50,3.
中国中医药图书情报杂志2016,Vol.40Issue(4):48-50,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.2016.04.013

论《本草纲目》与《本草备要》版本体例之异同

Discussion on the Similarities and Differences in the Version and Style ofBen Cao Gang Mu andBen Cao Bei Yao

邓勇 1程新 1黄辉1

作者信息

  • 1. 安徽中医药大学,安徽 合肥 230038
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Ben Cao Gang MuandBen Cao Bei Yaoare representative works of Chinese Materia Medica in the Ming and Qing Dynasties. There are similarities as well as unique characteristics in the version, style, compilation ideas and purposes of the two books. In the version aspect, “Jinling Version”, “Jiangxi Version” and “Hefei Version” are the three versions of the system ofBen Cao Gang Mu. Due to the revision and enlargement of the author (Wang Ang),Ben Cao Bei Yao developed intoSupplement of Ben Cao Bei Yao, Based on the two versions, two version systems were extended. In the style, detailed discussion and complete entry are the important characteristics of theBen Cao Gang Mu. Explaining profound theories in simple language and more emphasis on practical entry are the unique features of theBen Cao Bei Yao. There are similarities and difference between the two books.

关键词

《本草纲目》/《本草备要》/版本/体例/李时珍/汪昂

Key words

Ben Cao Gang Mu/Ben Cao Bei Yao/version/style/Li Shizhen/Wang Ang

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

邓勇,程新,黄辉..论《本草纲目》与《本草备要》版本体例之异同[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2016,40(4):48-50,3.

基金项目

安徽省卫计委中医药科研课题 ()

中国中医药图书情报杂志

2095-5707

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文