| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床口腔医学杂志|BEGO 种植体非埋入式与埋入式愈合疗效的对比研究

BEGO 种植体非埋入式与埋入式愈合疗效的对比研究

胡哲雄 魏本娟 郁利

临床口腔医学杂志2016,Vol.32Issue(8):499-500,501,3.
临床口腔医学杂志2016,Vol.32Issue(8):499-500,501,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2016.08.016

BEGO 种植体非埋入式与埋入式愈合疗效的对比研究

Comparison of applying the non-submerged and submerged osseointegrated BEGO dental implants

胡哲雄 1魏本娟 1郁利1

作者信息

  • 1. 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院口腔科 上海 200127
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To compare the results of non-submerged surgery with submerged surgery on BEGO implant system.Methods:Ninety-three BEGO implants were used to replace the missed posterior teeth of 79 patients.Three groups were divided based on the insertion torque value of the implants.The value was smaller than 20 N.cm and that would belong to group A as the controlled group.The rest cases were assigned to group B and group C randomly,by using submerged and non-submerged surgery respectively.Resonance frequency analy-sis measurements were used to evaluate the implant stability of group B and C before restoration.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the ISQ value between the group B and C( P>0.05).All implants were in good condition after 12 months followed-up.Conclusion:Non-submerged surgery simplifies the treatment procedure and it could be a good choice when the insertion torque value of the implants is acceptable.

关键词

BEGO种植系统/非埋入式愈合/共振频率分析

Key words

BEGO implant system/Non-submerged surgery/Resonance frequency analysis

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

胡哲雄,魏本娟,郁利..BEGO 种植体非埋入式与埋入式愈合疗效的对比研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2016,32(8):499-500,501,3.

临床口腔医学杂志

OACSTPCD

1003-1634

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文