| 注册
首页|期刊导航|护理学报|文献质量评价工具在我国护理领域系统评价/Meta分析中的应用现况

文献质量评价工具在我国护理领域系统评价/Meta分析中的应用现况

孙梦源 宋杰 许阳 李永刚 康晓凤

护理学报2016,Vol.23Issue(16):22-25,4.
护理学报2016,Vol.23Issue(16):22-25,4.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.16.022

文献质量评价工具在我国护理领域系统评价/Meta分析中的应用现况

Evaluation Tools for Literature Quality in Systematic Review/Meta-analysis of Clinical Nursing Trials

孙梦源 1宋杰 2许阳 3李永刚 4康晓凤4

作者信息

  • 1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院 妇产科,北京 100730
  • 2. 中国人民解放军总医院 护理部,北京 100853
  • 3. 中国医学科学院北京协和医院 国际医疗部,北京 100730
  • 4. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院护理学院研究生院,北京 100144
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To describe the application of evaluation tools for literature quality in systematic reviews/Meta-analysis of clinical nursing trials. Methods We conducted literature review on systematic reviews/Meta-analysis in clinical nursing trials in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Biomedical, Wanfang Data, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and used SPSS to analyze the data. Results A total of 441 papers including systematic review/Meta-analysis were found and 4 categories 18 kinds of evaluation tools for literature quality were extracted. Of the total, Cochrane collaboration ’s tool for assessing risk of bias appeared in 189 (41.9%) papers, Jadad scale in 119 (26.4%), The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) in 23 (5.1%), Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) in 17 (3.8%). Conclusion To improve the quality of systematic reviews/Meta-analysis, it is important to apply evaluation tools for literature quality and Cochrane collaboration ’s tool for assessing risk of bias is recommended.

关键词

系统评价/Meta分析/文献质量/护理

Key words

systematic reviews/Meta-analysis/literature quality/nursing

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

孙梦源,宋杰,许阳,李永刚,康晓凤..文献质量评价工具在我国护理领域系统评价/Meta分析中的应用现况[J].护理学报,2016,23(16):22-25,4.

护理学报

OACSTPCD

2097-6569

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文