| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中外医学研究|传统手术与小切口微创手术治疗小儿疝气的效果比较

传统手术与小切口微创手术治疗小儿疝气的效果比较

孔亮

中外医学研究2016,Vol.14Issue(23):23-24,25,3.
中外医学研究2016,Vol.14Issue(23):23-24,25,3.DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2016.23.012

传统手术与小切口微创手术治疗小儿疝气的效果比较

The Effect Comparison of Traditional Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgical in the Treatment of Pediatric Hernia

孔亮1

作者信息

  • 1. 大同市第六人民医院 山西 大同 037000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery in pediatric hernia.Method:From March 2013 to March 2015,120 children with hernia surgery in our hospital were randomly selected as the study objects,and were randomly divided into two groups,the study group underwent minimally invasive surgery,the control group was taken traditional surgery.The clinical efficacy and the incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups were compared.Result:The operation time,incision,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay and wound healing time in the study group were better than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were 4 cases of postoperative complications in the study group,the rate of complication was 6.7%,there were 13 cases of complications in the control group,the rate of complication was 21.7%.The incidence of complications in two groups had statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Minimally invasive surgical has a small incision minimally invasive surgical trauma, which is conducive to wound healing and postoperative recovery,and fewer adverse reactions,is fit for application of pediatric clinical surgery.

关键词

小儿疝气/小切口/微创/疗效

Key words

Pediatric hernia/Small incision/Minimally invasive/Efficacy

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

孔亮..传统手术与小切口微创手术治疗小儿疝气的效果比较[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(23):23-24,25,3.

中外医学研究

1674-6805

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文