华北水利水电大学学报（社会科学版）2016，Vol.32Issue(4)：41-45,5.
《黄帝四经》的“正名-用名”逻辑研究
A Logic Study of “Zheng Ming-Yong Ming” in Four Classics of Huangdi
摘要
Abstract
Since logistics studies argument structure and rules, we point out that the logic of the Four Classics of Huangdi is“Zheng Ming-Yong Ming” argument structure. “Zheng Ming” defines things involved, which reflects the Ming Shi viewpoint of Tao-ism;”Yong Ming” appears in the emperor’ s strategies for ruling the nation, and is the guarantee of governing and social administra-tion. The“Zheng Ming-Yong Ming” logic in Four Classics of Huangdi is part of the Taoists logic in pre-Qin period, and Lao Tse main-ly discusses “Tao” Ming, Guan Zi and Four Classics of Huangdi mainly discuss “Wu” Ming ( i. e. , social politics) , while Chuang Tse concerns both. The “Zheng Ming-Yong Ming” logic is a kind of argument structure relating to concrete cases, and clearly posses-ses the utilitarian spirit of social politics. The pre-Qin Taoists logic is part of pre-Qin logics. All Pre-Qin logics belong to the same cat-egory, and they are not deductive or inductive logics, also not Buddhist logic. As an argument structure,“Zheng Ming-Yong Ming” is a type of Chinese logics instead of Chinese philosophy, but it should be based on Chinese philosophy. Therefore, we confirm the identi-ty of Chinese logics.关键词
《黄帝四经》/逻辑/正名/用名Key words
Four Classics of Huangdi/logic/Zheng Ming/Yong Ming分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
曾昭式..《黄帝四经》的“正名-用名”逻辑研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报（社会科学版）,2016,32(4):41-45,5.基金项目
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目《基于广义论证的先秦逻辑研究》(10JJD720009) （10JJD720009）
国家社科基金项目《基于跨文化互动下的中国近现代汉传因明研究》(14BZX074) （14BZX074）
