口腔疾病防治2016，Vol.24Issue(9)：528-533,6.DOI:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.09.007
超薄贴面与常规贴面临床对比研究
A clinical research on thin porcelain laminate veneer and conventional porcelain laminate veneer
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical results of thin porcelain laminate veneer and conventional porcelain laminate veneer. Methods 20 patients were restored with 72 thin porcelain laminate veneers, and 45 patients were re⁃stored with 120 conventional porcelain laminate veneers. Clinical reevaluations were performed 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after insertion of the veneers according to the modified USPHS⁃criteria. Survival⁃rate and success⁃rate were re⁃corded. Results After an observation period up to 3 years, thin porcelain laminate veneers and conventional porcelain laminate veneers showed good clinical results in terms of secondary caries, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, color match and anatomic form. Both the survival⁃rate and success⁃rate were above 90%, and no significant differences were found between the 2 veneer groups with the correction for continuity Pearson's c2 test (P > 0.05). Conclusion Thin porcelain laminate veneer could obtain the same clinical results as conventional porcelain laminate veneer, howev⁃er the indications should be selected properly and a higher level of operation technique is also required. A long period of clinical results remains to be observed.关键词
超薄贴面/常规贴面/留存率/成功率/美学修复Key words
Thin porcelain laminate veneer/Conventional porcelain laminate veneer/Survival rate/Success rate/Aesthetic restoration分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
左陈启,韦丽萍,吕杰,唐尤超,王远勤..超薄贴面与常规贴面临床对比研究[J].口腔疾病防治,2016,24(9):528-533,6.基金项目
广东省医学科研基金 （）
