上海针灸杂志2016，Vol.35Issue(9)：1112-1114,3.DOI:10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2016.09.1112
药罐法与刺络放血法治疗慢性腰痛疗效对比研究
Comparative Study on the Therapeutic Efficacy between Medicinal Cupping and Bloodletting for Chronic Low Back Pain
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy between medicinal cupping and collateral-pricking bloodletting therapy in treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH) and non-specific low back pain.Method Sixty LIDH patients were randomized into treatment group 1 and control group 1, 30 cases in each group. Sixty non-specific low back pain patients were randomized into treatment group 2 and control group 2, 30 cases in each group. Treatment group 1 and 2 were intervened by medicinal cupping, while control group 1 and 2 were by collateral-pricking bloodletting. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were observed before and after intervention.Result The VAS and ODI scores were significantly changed after intervention in treatment group 1, treatment group 2, and control group 2 (P<0.05). The VAS score was significantly changed after intervention in control group 1 (P<0.05); the ODI score didn’t show significant change after intervention in control group 1 (P>0.05). After treatment, there was a significant difference in comparing the ODI score between control group 1 and control group 2 (P<0.05).Conclusion Medicinal cupping and collateral-pricking bloodletting are both effective in treating chronic low back pain, and medicinal cupping has its advantage in improving ODI compared to the bloodletting therapy.关键词
拔罐/药罐/刺络拔罐疗法/腰痛/腰椎间盘突出症/椎间盘移位Key words
Cupping/Medicinal cupping/Blood-letting puncturing and cupping/Low back pain/Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation/Intervertebral disc displacement分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
潘良,马学红,韩双,胡慧..药罐法与刺络放血法治疗慢性腰痛疗效对比研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2016,35(9):1112-1114,3.基金项目
北京中医药大学自主课题(2013-JYBZZ-JS-179) （2013-JYBZZ-JS-179）
