| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国药房|3种药物性肝损伤诊断评分系统的应用及比较

3种药物性肝损伤诊断评分系统的应用及比较

徐琴 刘浩 张跃新

中国药房2016,Vol.27Issue(26):3633-3635,3.
中国药房2016,Vol.27Issue(26):3633-3635,3.DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2016.26.10

3种药物性肝损伤诊断评分系统的应用及比较

Application and Comparison of 3 Kinds of Diagnostic Criterion for Drug-induced Liver Injury

徐琴 1刘浩 1张跃新1

作者信息

  • 1. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院感染性疾病中心,乌鲁木齐 830054
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To analyze and compare the congruity between Maria and DDW-J standard and Roussel uclaf causali-ty assessment method(RUCAM)for diagnosing drug-induced liver injury(DILI),and evaluate its application. METHODS:In ret-rospective analysis,the clinical data of 122 patients with DILI with RUCAM ≥3 scores was quantitatively scored by Maria and DDW-J standard,χ2 test was conducted for statistical analysis. RESULTS:Among the 122 cases,120 cases(98.4%)were classi-fied as“likely and possible”by DDW-J standard,which was significantly higher than the 58 cases(47.5%)that classified as“pos-sible”by Maria standard,with statistical significance;and compared with Maria standard,DDW-J standard was more closer to RU-CAM scoring results. CONCLUSIONS:DDW-J standard is superior to Maria standard,and close to RUCAM scoring results for DI-LI;RUCAM is still the DILI diagnostic evaluation system with high accuracy and operability.

关键词

药物性肝损伤/诊断标准/RUCAM/Maria标准/DDW-J标准

Key words

Drug-induced liver injury/Diagnostic criterion/RUCAM/Maria standard/DDW-J standard

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

徐琴,刘浩,张跃新..3种药物性肝损伤诊断评分系统的应用及比较[J].中国药房,2016,27(26):3633-3635,3.

基金项目

中国肝炎防治基金会天晴肝病研究基金 ()

中国药房

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1001-0408

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文