| 注册
首页|期刊导航|西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)|美国PRMS与SEC两种油气储量准则差异分析

美国PRMS与SEC两种油气储量准则差异分析

李洪玺 张培军 代琤 张沁

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)2016,Vol.38Issue(5):75-80,6.
西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)2016,Vol.38Issue(5):75-80,6.DOI:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.07.22.01

美国PRMS与SEC两种油气储量准则差异分析

Difference Analysis of Oil & Gas Reserve Rule Between PRMS and SEC in U. S.

李洪玺 1张培军 2代琤 1张沁1

作者信息

  • 1. 中国石油川庆钻探工程公司地质勘探开发研究院,四川 成都 610051
  • 2. 中国石油 土库曼斯坦 阿姆河天然气公司,北京 昌平 102249
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

To effectively distinguish and accurately use America PRMS and SEC reserves evaluation rules,we compared and analyzed the two reserve classification systems. The two reserve rules have similarities and differences. The reserves must be found,recoverable,economical and with economic surplus to be confirmed by both PRMS and SEC. The SEC not only evaluates proved reserve as dose PRMS but also evaluates possible and probable reserve. The differences between the PRMS and the SEC include liquid contact,fault upthrow and down throw reserve definition,PUD offset,analogy reservoir, reliable technique,5 year PUD plan,economic,oil price&cost. The SEC reserve evaluation is based on the present economic circumstance,because it emphasizes oil and gas economical production and the lowest income of the company. The PRMS reserve evaluation is bases on forecasting economic circumstance,as it concerns the commercial value of the reserve and the return of the company′s investment.

关键词

PRMS/SEC/储量准则/分类体系/证实储量/油气储量

Key words

PRMS/SEC/reserve rule/classification system/proved reserve/oil&gas reserve

分类

能源科技

引用本文复制引用

李洪玺,张培军,代琤,张沁..美国PRMS与SEC两种油气储量准则差异分析[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(5):75-80,6.

基金项目

国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05059)。 ()

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1674-5086

访问量1
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文