| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国药房|泮托拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗胃食管反流的药物经济学评价

泮托拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗胃食管反流的药物经济学评价

张家兴 谢娟 高玲 李莲华 王忠元

中国药房2016,Vol.27Issue(29):4037-4040,4041,5.
中国药房2016,Vol.27Issue(29):4037-4040,4041,5.DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2016.29.02

泮托拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗胃食管反流的药物经济学评价

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Pantoprazole and Ranitidine in the Treatment of Gastricesophagitis Reflux Disease

张家兴 1谢娟 1高玲 1李莲华 1王忠元1

作者信息

  • 1. 贵州省人民医院药剂科,贵阳 550002
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the pharmacoeconomics of pantoprazole vs. ranitidine in the treatment of gastricesophagitis reflux disease(GERD). METHODS:Retrieved from PubMed,EMBase,The Cochrane Library,CNKI,VIP and Wanfang database, RCTs about pantoprazole vs. ranitidine in the treatment of GERD were selected until Sept. 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and extracted the data of included studies. Stata 12.0 soft-ware was used to estimate therapeutic efficacy index and cost,and cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with the decision tree model. RESULTS:A total of 7 RCTs were included,involving 1 389 patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that for gradeⅠ-Ⅲ(by Savary-Miller standard)GERD,cost-effectiveness ratios of ranitidine were all lower than those of pantoprazole(gradeⅠ:18.86 vs. 57.93;gradeⅡorⅢ:35.58 vs. 146.13);gradeⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲincremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)were 335.53,349.85,349.85. Sensitivity analysis supported this conclusion. CONCLUSIONS:Ranitidine is more economic therapy plan for gradeⅠ-Ⅲ GERD, but its ICER fluctuates greatly. Individual therapy plan should be formulated according to disease condition and economic condition.

关键词

泮托拉唑/雷尼替丁/胃食管反流/药物经济学/成本-效果分析/决策树模型

Key words

Pantoprazole/Ranitidine/Gastricesophagitis reflux disease/Pharmacoeconomics/Cost-effectiveness analysis/De-cision tree model

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

张家兴,谢娟,高玲,李莲华,王忠元..泮托拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗胃食管反流的药物经济学评价[J].中国药房,2016,27(29):4037-4040,4041,5.

基金项目

国家科技支撑计划子课题 ()

中国药房

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1001-0408

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文