太平洋学报2016，Vol.24Issue(9)：1-8,8.DOI:10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2016.9.001
南海仲裁案中国立场的主权理论解读
Interpretation of the Sovereignty Theory for China s Position to the South China Sea Arbitration Case
摘要
Abstract
From the perspective of sovereignty theory, we�ll find that the case of“South China Sea Arbitra⁃tion” is the issue of sovereignty which is not covered by compulsory arbitration. The pattern of sovereignty at present is a special mode of absolute sovereignty, in essence. Governing body is consciously trying to polar⁃ize the contents of the sovereignty to set up an orderly exterior environment under which the core content of the sovereignty will be well protected. The errors of“South China Sea Arbitration” are wrongly comprehen⁃ding the core content of the sovereignty, abusing the compulsory arbitration, and damnifying the sovereignty of China by act in excess of authority. When the core content of sovereignty was damnified, China�s position is a necessary protection which is consistent with the principle of sovereign equality of states and supported by the theory of sovereignty.关键词
中菲南海仲裁案/中国立场/主权理论Key words
South China Sea Arbitration Case/China�s position to the South China Sea Arbitration case/The theory of sovereignty分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
李志文,马玉..南海仲裁案中国立场的主权理论解读[J].太平洋学报,2016,24(9):1-8,8.基金项目
本文系教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目“中国与邻国海洋权益争端问题的国际法理研究”（12JZD048）的阶段性研究成果。 （）
