心理科学进展2016，Vol.24Issue(10)：1670-1676,7.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01670
关于假设检验的争议:问题的澄清与解决
Controversies on hypothesis testing:Clarification and solving of the problems
摘要
Abstract
Traditional hypothesis testing,which serves as the data analysis tool in psychological experiments,can be appraised according to two criterions,the first one is legality and the second utility.The logic foundation of traditional hypothesis testing,rooted in the frame of frequency school statistics,is,in fact,correct.But,in terms of utility,traditional hypothesis testing involves two shortcomings.One is that its alternative hypothesis can't be denied,and the other is that it can only provide qualitative conclusion.Confidence interval is suggested to replace traditional hypothesis testing to report the results of psychological experiments,for it can modify and supplement traditional hypothesis testing in these two aspects.Clarification of the mistakes in the using of traditional hypothesis testing also makes the researchers pay much attention to the PSI problem,which would turn the focus of the design and data analysis of psychological experiments from emphasizing population to emphasizing individuals.关键词
假设检验/频率学派/贝叶斯学派/置信区间/PSI问题Key words
hypothesis testing/frequency school/bayesian school/confidence interval/PSI problem分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
仲晓波..关于假设检验的争议:问题的澄清与解决[J].心理科学进展,2016,24(10):1670-1676,7.基金项目
教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(12YJA190026). （12YJA190026）
