摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of machine-used rotary nickel-titanium files K3,ProTaper and hand-used stainless steel files K in molar root canal preparation. Methods 136 patients which received root canal treatment in the hospital from September 2013 to August 2015 were enrolled. And 150 molars in the 136 patients were randomized into experi-mental K3 group (50 molars,168 root canals),experimental ProTaper group (50 molars,165 root canals) and control stainless steel K group (50 molars,160 root canals). Patients in the three groups received root canal preparation using rotary nickel-titani-um files K3,root canal files ProTaper and stainless steel files K respectively. Lateral condensation was used during root canal fill-ing process in three groups. X-ray was used to evaluate the effect of root canal preparation and filling. Preparation time of every single root canal,instrument fracture,postoperative adverse events and long-term effect were recorded. Results Compared with the stainless steel files,using nickel-titanium files K3 and ProTaper for root canal preparation had shorter preparation time,lower inci-dence rate of postoperative pain,better root canal filling and 6-month clinical efficacy. There was no instrument fracture in the K3 group during root canal preparation,while 1 pair of files broke respectively in the ProTaper group and stainless steel K group. Con-clusion Nickel-titanium files K3 and ProTaper could be used for fast and efficient root canal preparation with better root canal filling,less postoperative pain. Nickel-titanium files K3 and ProTaperwere more suitable for molar root canal preparation.关键词
根管预备/K3/ProTaper/磨牙/机用镍钛锉Key words
root canal preparation/K3/ProTaper/molar/machine-used rotary nickel-titanium files分类
医药卫生
