天津中医药2016，Vol.33Issue(12)：723-728,6.DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2016.12.06
中国老年医学系统评价/Meta分析的方法学与报告质量评价
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses in geriatrics in China
摘要
Abstract
Objective] To evaluate reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses. [Methods] CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM data base were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in geriatrics in China from the establishment date to May 2016. PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists were used to assess. [Results] A total of 193 systematic reviews and Meta-analyses involv-ing 65 systematic reviews and 128 Meta-analyses were identified. The quantity and quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses pub-lished on Chinese journal of geriatrics are increased and improved in recent years. The deficiencies of reporting and methodological qual-ity of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses mainly contained literature search, assessment of publication bias and publication funds. [Conclusion] The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses in geriatrics rises gradually over years in China, but it still needs to be further improved. The elder medical researchers need to promote evidence-based research capacity and strictly follow the standard format of report to write literature.关键词
老年/系统评价/Meta分析/质量评价Key words
geriatrics/systems analysis/Meta-analyses/quality assessment分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
赵颖,刘健..中国老年医学系统评价/Meta分析的方法学与报告质量评价[J].天津中医药,2016,33(12):723-728,6.基金项目
国家中医药管理局国家中医临床研究基地业务建设科研专项基金项目（JDZX2012145）。 （）
