南方医科大学学报2017，Vol.37Issue(1)：1-5,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.01.01
3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜在前列腺癌根治术中的对比：回顾性队列研究
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer：a retrospective cohort study
唐开强 1庞诗语 1包继明 1类成勇 1谭万龙1
作者信息
- 1. 南方医科大学南方医院泌尿外科，广东 广州 510515
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of patients with prostate cancer receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) using three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems. Methods From February, 2014 to January 2016, 72 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent LRP with 2D or 3D imaging systems performed by a single experienced surgeon. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and functional and oncologic outcomes of the patients were collected and analyzed. Results Thirty-six patients underwent 3D LRP and the other 36 patients underwent 2D LRP. Compared with 2D LRP group, 3D LRP group had a significantly shorter operative time (167 vs 218 min, P<0.001), a smaller volume of intraoperative blood loss (86.11 vs 177.78 mL, P<0.001) and a better early urinary continence outcome (88.89% vs 63.89%, P=0.026). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of complications, potency outcome or biochemical recurrence-free rate. Conclusion Compared with 2D LRP, 3D LRP shortens the operative time, reduces intraoperative blood loss and is associated with a better early urinary continence outcome in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.关键词
3D腹腔镜/2D腹腔镜/腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术Key words
three-dimensional imaging systems/two-dimensional imaging systems/laparoscopic radical prostatectomy/prostate cancer引用本文复制引用
唐开强,庞诗语,包继明,类成勇,谭万龙..3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜在前列腺癌根治术中的对比：回顾性队列研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2017,37(1):1-5,5.
