| 注册
首页|期刊导航|生物技术通报|酿酒酵母人工杂合启动子与天然启动子活性比较

酿酒酵母人工杂合启动子与天然启动子活性比较

唐瑞琪 熊亮 白凤武 赵心清

生物技术通报2017,Vol.33Issue(1):120-128,9.
生物技术通报2017,Vol.33Issue(1):120-128,9.DOI:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017.01.013

酿酒酵母人工杂合启动子与天然启动子活性比较

Activity Comparison of the Artificial Hybrid Promoter with Its Native Promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

唐瑞琪 1熊亮 2白凤武 1赵心清3

作者信息

  • 1. 上海交通大学生命科学技术学院,上海 200240
  • 2. 大连理工大学生命科学与技术学院,大连 116023
  • 3. 大连理工大学生命科学与技术学院,大连 116023
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

The responses of promoter strengths of artificial TEF1 promoter(PaTEF1)and native promoter PTEF1 as well as PTDH3 were comprehensively compared. The strength of PaTEF1 was not always higher than PTEF1,but varied along with the genetic background of host, medium,and cell growth phase. Among the three investigated hosts,PaTEF1 showed the highest strength in BY4741,while the lowest in LX03. The strengths of PaTEF1 were 1.4-4.6 and 0.9-2.0 times of those of native promoters(PTEF1 and PTDH3)in YPD100 medium,respectively. The activities of PaTEF1 in YPE(5% and 7%)were 0.7-1.3 and 0.8-1.3 times of PTEF1 and PTDH3. The activity of PaTEF1 in YPE was 1.7-2.0 times of that in YPD100,whereas 2.7-7.1 and 1.3-3.4 times for PTEF1 and PTDH3,respectively. The activities of the promoters in YEP were higher than those in YPD100,however,the activity variation of artificial promoters was less than that of native promoter. In addition,the variation trends of promoter strengths from early-log to mid-log phase and from mid-log to stationary phase varied in different host strains.

关键词

酿酒酵母/人工杂合启动子/TEF1启动子/宿主菌株/环境条件

Key words

Saccharomyces cerevisiae/artificial hybrid promoter/TEF1 promoter/host strain/environmental condition

引用本文复制引用

唐瑞琪,熊亮,白凤武,赵心清..酿酒酵母人工杂合启动子与天然启动子活性比较[J].生物技术通报,2017,33(1):120-128,9.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金项目 ()

生物技术通报

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1002-5464

访问量5
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文