| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国社区医师|两种不同测定方法检测血清抗甲状腺抗体临床诊断价值的比较

两种不同测定方法检测血清抗甲状腺抗体临床诊断价值的比较

张增荣

中国社区医师2017,Vol.33Issue(2):115-116,2.
中国社区医师2017,Vol.33Issue(2):115-116,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.100614x.2017.2.72

两种不同测定方法检测血清抗甲状腺抗体临床诊断价值的比较

Comparison of clinical diagnostic value of two different assay methods in detecting serum anti thyroid antibodies

张增荣1

作者信息

  • 1. 272031山东省济宁市传染病医院检验科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical diagnostic value of two different assay methods in detecting serum anti thyroid antibodies.Methods:120 cases with thyroid disease were selected as the observation group,at the same time,100 healthy people with examination were selected as the control group.All patients were tested for serum anti-thyroid antibodies using automated chemiluminescent immunoassay(CLIA)and radioimmunoassay(RIA).We compared the detection results of the different methods. Results:There was little difference between the results of CLIA and RIA in the detection of anti-thyroglobulin antibody(anti-TgAb)and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody(anti-TPOAb)test results,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:For the determination of serum anti-thyroid antibodies,using CLIA and RIA method can achieve better detection results,according to the actual situation of the hospital to choose a reasonable detection method,if necessary,make a combination use of the two methods.

关键词

自动化学发光免疫分析法/放射免疫分析法/抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体

Key words

Automatic chemiluminescence immunoassay/Radioimmunoassay/Anti thyroid globulin antibody

引用本文复制引用

张增荣..两种不同测定方法检测血清抗甲状腺抗体临床诊断价值的比较[J].中国社区医师,2017,33(2):115-116,2.

中国社区医师

1007-614X

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文