| 注册
首页|期刊导航|昆明医科大学学报|全自动酶联免疫分析仪与手工酶联免疫法的检测结果比较

全自动酶联免疫分析仪与手工酶联免疫法的检测结果比较

王胜虎 曹向红 李媛 陈琪

昆明医科大学学报2016,Vol.37Issue(10):96-99,4.
昆明医科大学学报2016,Vol.37Issue(10):96-99,4.

全自动酶联免疫分析仪与手工酶联免疫法的检测结果比较

Comparison of the Test Results between Automatic Enzyme-linked Immunity Analyzer and Manual Enzyme-linked Immunoassay

王胜虎 1曹向红 1李媛 2陈琪1

作者信息

  • 1. 昆明医科大学附属延安医院检验科,云南昆明 650051
  • 2. 昆明医科大学海源学院基础部,云南昆明 651700
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the consistency of the results of clinical specimens between Tecan Freedom Evolyzer-2200 automated enzyme immunoassay analyzer and manual ELISA method,so as to explore more scientific and reliable test method.Methods Ninety samples were randomly selected from clinical and physical examination,the IMARK2 microplate reader and the instrument operating manual sample measurement was used to test hepatitis A,hepatitis B 5,hepatitis C,hepatitis E 2,TP and HIV,and the results were given correlation and linear regression analysis.Results For the test items of HBsAg,HBsAb,HBeAg,TP,HIV,the correlation coefficient was r2> 0.9,the data showed a good correlation,and for HAV-IgM,HBeAb,HBcAb,HCV,HEV-IgM,HEV-IgG,the correlation coefficient was 0.9> r 2 > 0.6.Compared with manual method,the total coincidence rate of automated enzyme immunoassay analyzer was 96.9% in 11 indexes of 90 samples.Conclusions Automatic and manual ELISA method has a good correlation.Automatic ELISA also greatly reduce the labor burden of laboratory personnel,improve efficiency,should be strengthened in clinical practice.

关键词

全自动酶联免疫分析仪/手工酶联免疫法/ELISA的影响因素

Key words

Automatic ELISA/Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay manual/Factors of ELISA

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王胜虎,曹向红,李媛,陈琪..全自动酶联免疫分析仪与手工酶联免疫法的检测结果比较[J].昆明医科大学学报,2016,37(10):96-99,4.

基金项目

昆明市延安医院院内科研基金资助项目(yyky013-057) (yyky013-057)

昆明医科大学学报

OACSTPCD

1003-4706

访问量4
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文