| 注册
首页|期刊导航|针刺研究|《内经》与《难经》针刺补泻理论之区别

《内经》与《难经》针刺补泻理论之区别

李素云

针刺研究2017,Vol.42Issue(1):79-84,6.
针刺研究2017,Vol.42Issue(1):79-84,6.DOI:10.13702/j.1000-0607.2017.01.015

《内经》与《难经》针刺补泻理论之区别

Differences on Acupuncture Reinforcing and Reducing Theory Between Neijing and Nanjing

李素云1

作者信息

  • 1. 中国中医科学院针灸研究所,北京100700
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Reinforcing and reducing manipulation is the elite of traditional acupuncture needling methods.Abundant records could be found in Neijing (The Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon) and Nanjing (The Classic on Medical Problems) at early times.In the present paper,the author collates and compares the recordation of reinforcing and reducing acupuncture manipulation in these two classics on the basis of the principle and connotation of the two manipulations and from three key factors as stimulus location,manipulation technique and needling time.Based on objective analysis of the original text,distinct differences were found in above three aspects.Therefore,the conclusion is that Neijing and Nanjing resemble different medical school of thoughts at an early phase of acupuncture theories.

关键词

《内经》/《难经》/针刺/补泻/区别

Key words

Neijing/Nanjing/Acupuncture/Reinforcing and reducing/Difference

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李素云..《内经》与《难经》针刺补泻理论之区别[J].针刺研究,2017,42(1):79-84,6.

基金项目

北京市自然科学基金资助项目(No.7163223) (No.7163223)

国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目(No.2013 CB 532006) (No.2013 CB 532006)

中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No.ZZ 16009) (No.ZZ 16009)

针刺研究

OACSCDCSTPCDMEDLINE

1000-0607

访问量4
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文