| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国药房|塞来昔布在中国治疗骨关节炎的成本效果研究

塞来昔布在中国治疗骨关节炎的成本效果研究

Bruce C.M. Wang 谢小平 Wesley Furnback Ronald Caldwell

中国药房2017,Vol.28Issue(5):586-590,5.
中国药房2017,Vol.28Issue(5):586-590,5.DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2017.05.03

塞来昔布在中国治疗骨关节炎的成本效果研究

Cost-effectiveness Study of Celecoxib for Osteoarthritis in China

Bruce C.M. Wang 1谢小平 2Wesley Furnback 1Ronald Caldwell3

作者信息

  • 1. 亦熙有限公司,纽约 10053,美国
  • 2. 辉瑞投资有限公司 北京分公司,北京 100010
  • 3. 密歇根大学,密歇根安娜堡 48109,美国
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate cost-effectiveness of celecoxib for osteoarthritis(OA)in China. METHODS:OA cost-ef-fectiveness analysis model developed by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NICE)was adopted using celecoxib, diclofenac+PPIs as control. Related risk Zof adverse event was from CONDOR trials.The effectiveness was measured by QALY. Costs and QALYs were discounted annually at 4.76%. RESULTS:Celecoxib had a cost of $3 591 and 8.826 QALYs while diclofe-nac+PPIs had a cost of $3 674 and 8.830 QALYs. The incremental costs and QALYs of celecoxib to diclofenac+PPIs were -$83 and -0.004 QALYs,respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)for diclofenac+PPIs to celecoxib was$23 258/QALY. The results of single factor sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis showed that drug cost was driving factor of IC-ER,and the results of two therapy plans were similar. CONCLUSIONS:Celecoxib is a less costly alternative than diclofenac+PPIs. The difference in QALYs between celecoxib and diclofenac+PPIs is extremely small,so celecoxib is likely to be cost-effec-tive for OA patients.

关键词

骨关节炎/塞来昔布/双氯芬酸/质子泵抑制剂/成本效果/药物经济学

Key words

Osteoarthritis/Celecoxib/Diclofenac/PPI/Cost-effectiveness/Pharmacoeconomics

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

Bruce C.M. Wang,谢小平,Wesley Furnback,Ronald Caldwell..塞来昔布在中国治疗骨关节炎的成本效果研究[J].中国药房,2017,28(5):586-590,5.

基金项目

辉瑞投资有限公司资助课题 ()

中国药房

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1001-0408

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文