| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中华耳科学杂志|经迷路径路与经耳囊径路-House与Fisch比较

经迷路径路与经耳囊径路-House与Fisch比较

夏寅

中华耳科学杂志2017,Vol.15Issue(1):24-27,4.
中华耳科学杂志2017,Vol.15Issue(1):24-27,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2017.01.006

经迷路径路与经耳囊径路-House与Fisch比较

Translabyrinthine and Transotic Approaches:House versus Fisch Techniques

夏寅1

作者信息

  • 1. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院耳鼻喉科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Both the translabyrinthine and transotic approaches are used for acoustic neuroma resection. The trans-labyrinthine approach was frequently used by Dr. House, while Dr. Fisch preferred the transotic approach. Each ap-proach has its own advantages. It is generally believed that the transotic approach is an improved version of the translab-yrinthine approach, which enlarges the scope of the surgical approach and reduces the incidence of complications such as facial nerve injury and cerebrospinal fluid leakage.

关键词

经迷路径路/经耳囊经路/听神经瘤/比较

Key words

Translabyrinthine Approach/Transotic Approach/Acoustic Neuroma/Compare

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

夏寅..经迷路径路与经耳囊径路-House与Fisch比较[J].中华耳科学杂志,2017,15(1):24-27,4.

中华耳科学杂志

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1672-2922

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文