| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)|无创呼吸机ST模式和AVAPS模式治疗呼吸衰竭的效果比较

无创呼吸机ST模式和AVAPS模式治疗呼吸衰竭的效果比较

王志莲 柏长青

中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)2017,Vol.9Issue(2):141-144,4.
中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)2017,Vol.9Issue(2):141-144,4.DOI:10.12037/YXQY.2017.02-30

无创呼吸机ST模式和AVAPS模式治疗呼吸衰竭的效果比较

Comparison of the effect of non-invasive ventilator ST mode and AVAPS mode in patients with respira-tory failure

王志莲 1柏长青1

作者信息

  • 1. 中国人民解放军第三〇七医院 军事医学科学院附属医院 呼吸科,北京 100071
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect of average volume assured pressure suppont (AVAPS) mode and spontaneous breathing and time control (ST) mode in the treatment of patients with respiratory failure. Method Retrospectively analyzed the therapeutic effects of 63 patients with respiratory failure from October 2014 to October 2016, 3 patients were excluded during the course of treatment, and 60 patients included in the analysis were randomly divided into study group and control group. Study group patients were treated with AVAPS mode, control group patients were treated with ST mode. Before treatment and 24 hours and 4 days after treatment, the arterial partial pressure of carbon (PaCO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), actual bicarbonate (AB) level were compared between the two groups. Before treatment and 4 days after treatment, respiratory rate, heart rate, forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1% prediction were compared between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reaction were compared between the two groups 4 days after treatment. Result PaCO2, PaO2, arterial blood pH and AB level were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). PaCO2 and PaO2 were significantly improved (P < 0.05) and arterial blood pH and AB level were not significantly improved 24 hours and 4 days after treatment inside each group (P > 0.05). The respiratory rate and heart rate of the two groups were significantly lower than before treatment (P < 0.05). The FEV1, FEV1/FVC and FEV1% prediction of the two groups were significantly higher than before treatment (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of adverse reaction of study group were significantly lower than control group 4 days after treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusion AVAPS mode is better than ST mode in the treatment of respiratory failure, fewer adverse reactions makes it safe and reliable.

关键词

ST模式/AVAPS模式/呼吸衰竭

Key words

ST mode/AVAPS mode/Respiratory failure

引用本文复制引用

王志莲,柏长青..无创呼吸机ST模式和AVAPS模式治疗呼吸衰竭的效果比较[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2017,9(2):141-144,4.

中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)

OACSTPCD

1674-7372

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文