| 注册
首页|期刊导航|国际口腔医学杂志|HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper在树脂模拟根管中成形能力的比较研究

HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper在树脂模拟根管中成形能力的比较研究

李宗莉 彭彬

国际口腔医学杂志2017,Vol.44Issue(3):256-260,5.
国际口腔医学杂志2017,Vol.44Issue(3):256-260,5.DOI:10.7518/gjkq.2017.03.002

HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper在树脂模拟根管中成形能力的比较研究

Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of HyFlex, S3, K3XF and ProTaper in simulated curved canals

李宗莉 1彭彬1

作者信息

  • 1. 口腔基础医学省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地和口腔生物医学教育部重点实验室,武汉大学口腔医学院 武汉 430079
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the shaping ability of HyFlex, S3, K3XF and ProTaper in simulated resin canals. Methods Forty curved artificial root canals in resin blocks were divided into four groups randomly, and prepared to an apical using HyFlex, S3, K3XF and ProTaper, respectively. Images of pre- and post-instrumentation were superimposed by Photoshop CS5. Incidence of instrument fracture was recorded. The amount of resin removed by each system was measured at 10 measuring points by AutoCAD 2010. The data were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance. Results One case of instrument fracture occurred in S3, K3XF and ProTaper respectively. The centering ability of HyFlex was the best at 2 mm to 3 mm from the apex(P<0.05). At 4 mm to 6 mm levels, K3XF showed a significantly higher centering ability(P<0.05). Conclusion The four systems could maintain the original canal morphology well without obvious canal transportation and ledging. In the apical of the root canal, the shaping ability of HyFlex was the best compared with others, whereas K3XF seemed to have more advantages in the middle.

关键词

镍钛器械/中心定位能力/模拟树脂根管

Key words

nickel-titanium instrument/centering ability/simulated root canal

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李宗莉,彭彬..HyFlex、S3、K3XF以及ProTaper在树脂模拟根管中成形能力的比较研究[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2017,44(3):256-260,5.

基金项目

湖北省自然科学基金(2014CFA059)This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2014CFA059). (2014CFA059)

国际口腔医学杂志

OACSCDCSTPCD

1673-5749

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文