摘要
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of applying conventional western treatment combined with blood circulation method in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Methods:Randomly Selected 144 cases of our hospital hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients from January 2014 to June 2016,and 90 cases were male and 54 cases were female;aged 40 to 72 years (mean age 61.23± 10.42).Randomly divided into two groups,A group of 72 cases of the study group,group B as a reference group with 72 examples,A group of western medicine combined with traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine treatment program,group B was with western medicine treatment.Finally,A,B treatment,the results were analyzed and compared.Results:The two groups of patients in the acute phase of the total efficiency was respectively 50.23％ and 31.36％,the group A was better than the group B,and the difference was significant (P ＜ 0.05).A,B groups onset always had three months after an efficiency of 89.46％ and 80.55％,respectively,the group A was better than group B,and the difference was significant (P ＜ 0.05).3 months after the onset modified Rankin scale score of the two groups of patients comparison meaningful difference (P ＜ 0.05),A,B groups of 3 months and the incidence of treatment of 21 d contrast meaningful difference (P ＜ 0.05),and A degree of disability groups to improve the situation was better than in group B patients.A,B groups exist range 0.1 ～ 10cm3 hematoma patients were 38 cases and 36 cases;10 ～50cm3.The scope of hematoma patients were 32 cases and 34 cases.The two groups in the range of 0.1 ～ 10cm3 hematoma comparison meaningless (P ＞ 0.05);in the range of 10 ～ 50cm3 hematoma comparison meaningful difference (P ＜ 0.05),and the A hematoma volume reduction conditions was more than those in group B,it was good.The two groups of patients before treatment and after treatment 7d and edema volume,there was insignificant difference (P ＞ 0.05).The two groups of patients after treatment 21d,the incidence of three months,and the difference between the two Barthel scale score comparison,the differences were no significance (P ＞ 0.05).The two groups of patients of NIHSS scale scores before and after treatment ld,15d,21d contrast difference significance (P ＞ 0.05),while the incidence of contrast difference three months of significant (P ＜ 0.05),the treatment of the group A was better than group B.The two groups of patients after treatment 15d stasis syndrome score was 2.44±3.14,4.59±4.65,was lower than group B,there was significant differences (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion:The group A was significantly more effective than the group B,high treatment efficiency,and effectively improve the patient's disability,should be promoted.关键词
急性期/高血压性脑出血/活血化瘀Key words
Acute phase/Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage/Blood circulation分类
医药卫生
