| 注册
首页|期刊导航|可再生能源|基于Aspen Plus的污泥热解与混烧技术经济特性对比分析

基于Aspen Plus的污泥热解与混烧技术经济特性对比分析

杨儒浦 胡松 池寰瀛 单联莹 张安超 向军

可再生能源2017,Vol.35Issue(6):798-804,7.
可再生能源2017,Vol.35Issue(6):798-804,7.

基于Aspen Plus的污泥热解与混烧技术经济特性对比分析

Techno-economic comparison analysis of sewage sludge pyrolysis and co-combustion based on Aspen Plus

杨儒浦 1胡松 1池寰瀛 2单联莹 1张安超 1向军3

作者信息

  • 1. 华中科技大学 中欧清洁与可再生能源学院, 湖北 武汉 430074
  • 2. 华中科技大学 煤燃烧国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 3. 河南理工大学 机械与动力工程学院, 河南 焦作 454000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Based on Aspen Plus and Aspen Process Economic Analyzer, techno -economic comparison analysis was carried out between sewage sludge pyrolysis and sewage sludge co-combustion with coal. The comparison includes five crucial factors (transportation cost, product revenue, carbon tax, subsidy and sludge water content) that would affect the economic performance of the technology. The result illustrated that the co-combustion technology is more sensitive to transportation cost than pyrolysis. The co-combustion technology can be profitable when the transportation distance is within 13 km or sludge water content lower than 50%. The product revenue affects the pyrolysis at most, it can be profitable when product revenue increases over 15%or sludge water content lower than 42%. And pyrolysis technology is more preferable than co-combustion technology when sludge water content is larger than 35%.

关键词

污泥热解/污泥混煤燃烧/技术经济分析/敏感性分析/AspenPlus

Key words

sewage sludge pyrolysis/sewage sludge co-combustion with coal/techno-economic analysis/sensitivity analysis/Aspen Plus

分类

能源科技

引用本文复制引用

杨儒浦,胡松,池寰瀛,单联莹,张安超,向军..基于Aspen Plus的污泥热解与混烧技术经济特性对比分析[J].可再生能源,2017,35(6):798-804,7.

基金项目

国家高技术研究发展("863")计划(2012AA063504) ("863")

国家自然科学基金项目(51576072,51306046). (51576072,51306046)

可再生能源

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1671-5292

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文