河北医学2017，Vol.23Issue(6)：895-897,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2017.06.05
限制性液体复苏与常规液体复苏治疗失血性休克的疗效对比研究
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Limitesd Fluid Resuscitation and Conventional Fluid Resuscitation in Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic Shock
摘要
Abstract
Objective:To explore and analyze limitesd fluid resuscitation and conventional liquid recovery efficacy for the treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock.Methods: 90 cases of patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock admitted in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2017 were selected as objects.All the patients were divided into limitesdgroup and conventional resuscitation group by random number table, 45 cases in each group.The mortality and complication rates and laboratory indexes, average infusion quantity of two groups were compared.Results: Compared with the conventional liquid resuscitation group, the 24h mortality rate, the mortality rate and complication rate in the 1 weeks were lower and the average transfusion rate was less, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).After two groups of treatment, compared with before treatment, HBG, Hct, PLT, BUN and Scr levels increased, PT time shortened, compared with the routine fluid resuscitation group, the indexes of the liquid resuscitation group improved more significantly.The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion: Compared with conventional fluid resuscitation, the treatment of hemorrhagic shock with limited fluid resuscitation has significant efficacy, low mortality and complication rate, better improvement of laboratory indexes and promotion of prognosis.关键词
限制性液体复苏/常规液体复苏/失血性休克/疗效Key words
Limitesd liquid resuscitation/Conventional liquid resuscitation/Uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock/The curative effect引用本文复制引用
王滨,王馨翊..限制性液体复苏与常规液体复苏治疗失血性休克的疗效对比研究[J].河北医学,2017,23(6):895-897,3.基金项目
广东省自然科学基金项目,(编号:s2012010009032) （编号:s2012010009032）
