| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国全科医学|中文版患者授权量表在老年慢性病患者中的信效度研究

中文版患者授权量表在老年慢性病患者中的信效度研究

王珊珊 刘彦慧 单秋菊 张阳 张翠红 张振香

中国全科医学2017,Vol.20Issue(21):2660-2664,5.
中国全科医学2017,Vol.20Issue(21):2660-2664,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.21.020

中文版患者授权量表在老年慢性病患者中的信效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Patient Empowerment Scale among the Elderly with Chronic Diseases

王珊珊 1刘彦慧 2单秋菊 3张阳 4张翠红 4张振香1

作者信息

  • 1. 450052河南省郑州市,郑州大学护理学院
  • 2. 300073天津市,天津中医药大学护理学院
  • 3. 450001河南省郑州市,郑州大学第二附属医院
  • 4. 450001河南省郑州市,郑州大学第一附属医院
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To translate the English version of Patient Empowerment Scale(PES) into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity,and assess the serviceability of the Chinese version of PES among the elderly with chronic diseases.Methods We adapted the English version of PES following the Brislin′s classic model for translation and validation of instruments guidelines for cross-cultural research,including translation,back translation,expert consultation for adjusting the items,then,after a pilot survey using the initial scale,we developed the formal Chinese version of PES.Three hundred elderly patients with chronic diseases who were older than 60 selected by convenient sampling from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were surveyed by the Chinese version of PES between April and June 2015.Thirty participants were selected from those who had actively responded to the survey for the test-retest two weeks later.SPSS 17.0 and AMOS 17.0 were used for data analysis.The content validity index(CVI) was used to measure the content validity;exploratory factor analysis was used to measure the construct validity;common factors were extracted with principal component analysis and maximum variance orthogonal rotation,and maximum likelihood method was used for confirmatory factor analysis.The Cronbach′s α,split half,and test-retest were used for reliability analysis.Results A total of 94.7%(284/300) of the participants actively responded to the initial questionnaire survey.The item-total correlation coefficient in the Chinese version of PES ranged from 0.570 to 0.828(P<0.01).There were significant differences in the scores of 20 items between the high-score group and low-score group(P<0.05).The S-CVI was 0.96.I-CVI ranged from 0.90 to 1.00.The KMO value for the scale by exploratory factor analysis was 0.851,and result of Bartlett′s test of sphericity was χ2 =1 099.428(P<0.01).Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,which could explain 73.458% of the total variance.The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit,P=0.348.The Cronbach′s α of the Chinese version of PES was 0.931,split-half reliability was 0.814,test-retest reliability was 0.820(P<0.01).Conclusion The Chinese version of PES is reliable and valid,so it can be used to assess the empowerment of elderly patients with chronic diseases.

关键词

慢性病/老年人/信度/效度

Key words

Chronic disease/Aged/Reliability/Validity

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王珊珊,刘彦慧,单秋菊,张阳,张翠红,张振香..中文版患者授权量表在老年慢性病患者中的信效度研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(21):2660-2664,5.

基金项目

国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BSH124) (14BSH124)

河南省医学科学技术攻关计划省部共建项目(201201014) (201201014)

郑州大学护理学院新兴学科招标课题资助(2014HLXK010) (2014HLXK010)

中国全科医学

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1007-9572

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文