| 注册
首页|期刊导航|国际医学放射学杂志|MRI、MR肩关节造影及高频超声诊断肩袖损伤的差异性分析

MRI、MR肩关节造影及高频超声诊断肩袖损伤的差异性分析

王志斌 于春洋 张乐 陈奇

国际医学放射学杂志2017,Vol.40Issue(4):386-390,5.
国际医学放射学杂志2017,Vol.40Issue(4):386-390,5.DOI:10.19300/j.2017.L4659zt

MRI、MR肩关节造影及高频超声诊断肩袖损伤的差异性分析

Comparison of MRI, MR shoulder joint arthrography and high frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff injury

王志斌 1于春洋 2张乐 1陈奇1

作者信息

  • 1. 天津市第五中心医院放射科,天津 300450
  • 2. 天津市第五中心医院超声科,天津 300450
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To investigate the abilities of MRI, MR shoulder joint arthrography (MRAr) and high fre-quency ultrasound in diagnosis of rotator cuff injury. Methods Eighty four patients with suspected rotator cuff injury were treated in The Fifth Central Hospital of Tianjin from February 2015 to September 2016, there were 52 males and 32 fe-males, aged 22-64 years, with an average of (48.2 ±12.1) years. Retrospectively analyzed the imaging data of MRI, MR shoulder joint arthrography and high frequency ultrasound,χ2 test was used to compare the difference in diagnostic efficacy between MRI and high frequency ultrasound. Kappa test was used to analyze the consistency of MRI, high frequency ultra-sound with shoulder arthroscopy, and the consistency of the 3 methods of MRI, high frequency ultrasound and MRAr com-bined with shoulder arthroscopy was analyzed respectively. Results The accuracy of MRI, MRAr, and high frequency ul-trasound in the diagnosis of typeⅠrotator cuff injury was 100%. MRAr has a very high detection rate for typeⅠ, type Ⅱ and type Ⅳ rotator cuff injury, and the accuracy was 97.8%(45/46), but was invalid for type Ⅲ, typeⅤand typeⅥrota-tor cuff injury. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI and high frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff injury were:88.8%, 75.0%, and 88.1%;87.5%, 75%, and 86.9%, respectively, and there were not statistically signif-icant between them (χ2=0.856, P=0.1). Combining MRI, MRAr and high frequency ultrasound, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in diagnosing rotator cuff injury were 93.7%, 100%and 94%, respectively. The three methods had good con-sistency compared with shoulder arthroscopy in detecting rotator cuff injury (κ=0.81, P=0.001;κ=0.79, P<0.001;κ=0.94, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion High frequency ultrasound can be used as the primary method for rotator cuff injury, and MRI is an effective complement. MRAr has a very high detection rate for type Ⅰ,Ⅱ type, and type Ⅳ rotator cuff in-jury. The three methods complement each other, and combination can improve the diagnostic accuracy.

关键词

肩袖损伤/磁共振成像/肩关节造影/高频超声/肩关节镜/对比剂

Key words

Rotator cuff injury/Magnetic resonance imaging/Shoulder joint arthrography/High frequency ultrasound/Shoulder arthroscopy/Contrast agent

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王志斌,于春洋,张乐,陈奇..MRI、MR肩关节造影及高频超声诊断肩袖损伤的差异性分析[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2017,40(4):386-390,5.

国际医学放射学杂志

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1674-1897

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文