| 注册
首页|期刊导航|生态学报|水稻秸秆还田时间对土壤真菌群落结构的影响

水稻秸秆还田时间对土壤真菌群落结构的影响

李鹏 吕卫光 唐雪明 李永春 史加亮 郑宪清 武国干 蒋玮 赵凯 明凤 潘爱虎

生态学报2017,Vol.37Issue(13):4309-4317,9.
生态学报2017,Vol.37Issue(13):4309-4317,9.DOI:10.5846/stxb201603110431

水稻秸秆还田时间对土壤真菌群落结构的影响

Rice straw return of different decomposition days altered soil fungal community structure

李鹏 1吕卫光 2唐雪明 3李永春 1史加亮 4郑宪清 5武国干 3蒋玮 1赵凯 1明凤 1潘爱虎2

作者信息

  • 1. 上海市农业科学院生物技术研究所,上海201106
  • 2. 复旦大学生命科学学院,上海200438
  • 3. 上海市农业科学院生态环境保护研究所,上海201403
  • 4. 浙江农林大学环境与资源学院,临安311300
  • 5. 德州市农业科学研究院,德州253000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

The decomposition of plant residue is largely mediated by microorganisms,such as soil fungi and bacteria,which are very sensitive to changes in their soil environments.Numerous studies at the microbial community level have emphasized the influence of residue return on functional capacity and the characterization of phenotypic traits.Furthermore,previous studies have also shown that fungi dominate the early stages of decomposition in semi-natural unfertilized soils.The longterm impact of straw return on soil ecosystems,especially fungal gene abundance and community composition,is unclear.In the present study,based on the analysis of soil properties,we investigated the effect of rice straw return on the population size and community structure of soil fungi under different straw return days,using real-time PCR and PCR-DGGE.Subsequently,the correlation between fungal community and soil environmental factors was analyzed using redundancy analysis (RDA).Treatments in the present study were based on different return days (90,180,270,and 360 d),and a soil with no straw return and similar topography was used as the control.Each treatment had three replicates.The copy numbers of soil fungal ITS ranged from 2.61×107 to 6.46× 107 per g of dry soil and was greatly influenced by straw return days.The 360-d treatment yielded the highest copy numbers,whereas the 90-d treatment yielded the lowest copy numbers.The diversity indices (H,R,and E) increased significantly with increasing straw decomposition time and reached maximum values under the 360-d treatment.The DGGE patterns suggested that straw return altered the fungal community,and significant differences were observed among the treatments with different return days.Eleven DGGE bands were reamplified,sequenced,and aligned using BLAST;and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the soil fungal community of the straw return included Zygomycete sp.,Pythium salinum,uncultured Sarcosomataceae,Ascobolus stercorarius,Lagenidium giganteum,Penicillium sp.,Aspergillus sp.,Thermomyces lanuginosus,Aspergillus glaucus,Polymyxa graminis,and Acremonium sp.,among which Penicillium sp.,Aspergillus sp.,and Acremonium sp.are able to degrade cellulose.RDA analysis suggested the 90-d and 180-d treatments were similar and clearly distinct from the 270-d and 360-d treatments along both the first and second ordination axes,which indicated a pronounced difference in the community composition of soil fungi at the late straw return stage and a slight difference in the early stage,respectively.The eigenvalues of the first two axes of the fungal RDA results were 0.309 and 0.144 and accounted for 80.7% of the total eigenvalue,which suggested qualified ordination results.The first two axes of the species-environment relationship from the RDA results explained 74.8% of the total variance.Among the six soil parameters measured,the influence of available K,alkaline-hydrolyzed N,total N were not significant (P<0.05),but soil organic carbon,pH,and available P were the main factors that influenced the variation of fungal community structure and diversity.The results suggested that long-term straw return had a significant impact on soil fungal composition and that soil organic carbon,pH,and available P are important factors in the dynamics of soil fungal communities.

关键词

桔秆还田/多样性/土壤真菌/群落结构/基因丰度

Key words

straw return/diversity/soil fungi/community structure/gene abundance

引用本文复制引用

李鹏,吕卫光,唐雪明,李永春,史加亮,郑宪清,武国干,蒋玮,赵凯,明凤,潘爱虎..水稻秸秆还田时间对土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(13):4309-4317,9.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金青年项目(31500461) (31500461)

上海市农委科技兴农重点攻关项目(沪农科攻字(2015)第4-3号) (沪农科攻字(2015)

上海市市级农口系统青年人才成长计划(沪农青字(2015)第1-30号) (沪农青字(2015)

上海市农科院青年科技人员“助跑”计划(ZP17) (ZP17)

上海市农科院科技发展基金(农科发2013(03) (农科发2013(03)

生态学报

OA北大核心CHSSCDCSCDCSTPCD

1000-0933

访问量4
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文