西北国防医学杂志2017，Vol.38Issue(6)：364-368,5.DOI:10.16021/j.cnki.1007-8622.2017.06.004
意外伤害住院伤员损伤程度评分法与创伤严重度改良评分法比较
Comparison between ISS and RISS based on the wounded of accidental injury in hospital
杨建新 1刘志鹏 2张义 3席惠君4
作者信息
- 1. 白求恩国际和平医院院办,河北石家庄 050082
- 2. 解放军305医院医务部
- 3. 第二军医大学卫生勤务学系
- 4. 第二军医大学长海医院护理部
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of the injury severity score (ISS) and revised injury severity score (RISS) on the wounded of accidental injury,to provide a more appropriate wounded injury assessing method.Methods:A total of 2 282 wounded of accidental injury patients in hospital were evaluated by ISS and RISS.Results:RISS involved 3 743 (93.60％)wounded parts;ISS involved 3 140 (78.52％)wounded parts.RISS assessed 81.85％ wounded correctly and ISS only 42.07％ with multiple injuries.The group A and group B,group C and group B,group C and group D existed significant difference in ISS scores (P＜0.05),and the RISS method showed group A and group B,group C and group D had significant difference (P＜0.05),with no significant difference between group B and group C (P ＞0.05),which were more realistic.Conclusion:RISS is simple and can assess the injury severity of the wounded of accidental objectively and accurately,which fits for assessing accident harm wounded severity.关键词
创伤严重度评分法/意外伤害伤员/创伤严重度改良评分法Key words
ISS/wounded of accidental injury/RISS分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
杨建新,刘志鹏,张义,席惠君..意外伤害住院伤员损伤程度评分法与创伤严重度改良评分法比较[J].西北国防医学杂志,2017,38(6):364-368,5.
