| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国畜牧杂志|DMU、GBS和Herdsman3个软件育种值估计的比较

DMU、GBS和Herdsman3个软件育种值估计的比较

张越 杨宇泽 张金鑫 张锁宇 邱小田 唐韶青 丁向东

中国畜牧杂志2017,Vol.53Issue(7):29-35,7.
中国畜牧杂志2017,Vol.53Issue(7):29-35,7.DOI:10.19556/j.0258-7033.2017-07-029

DMU、GBS和Herdsman3个软件育种值估计的比较

Comparison of Breeding Value Estimation by DMU, GBS and Herdsman

张越 1杨宇泽 2张金鑫 1张锁宇 1邱小田 3唐韶青 2丁向东1

作者信息

  • 1. 中国农业大学动物科学技术学院,农业部动物遗传育种与繁殖重点实验室,国家畜禽育种工程实验室,北京100193
  • 2. 北京市畜牧总站,北京100029
  • 3. 全国畜牧总站,北京100125
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

The breeding and management in pig farm can benefit from professional software,which are helpful to upgrade pig breeding in China.Generally,breeding value estimation is the core among these breeding software,while the inconsistence of estimated breeding values (EBVs) of same animals from different software always confused animal breeders.Therefore,we investigated three popular software,DMU,GBS and Herdsman using pig breeding data and simulated data.Our results showed that the EBVs obtained from DMU4 were as highly as 0.99 correlated with those from GBS in the same scenario,as these two programs share same algorithm to estimate breeding value.DMU5 kept high consistence with DMU4.DMUAI generated higher accuracy in EBV than GBS and DMU4 as REML algorithm is implemented in DMUAI.Although EBVs from Herdsman were very low correlated with those from DMU and GBS,theoretically,Herdsman is supposed to has high consistence with DMU and GBS in same scenarios due to their common algorithm.Our results also indicated that breeding software do not take significant effect on the breeding value estimation,the model for genetic evaluation played more important role on the inconsistence of EBV.

关键词

/育种软件/育种值/相关性

Key words

Pig/Breeding software/Estimated breeding value

分类

农业科技

引用本文复制引用

张越,杨宇泽,张金鑫,张锁宇,邱小田,唐韶青,丁向东..DMU、GBS和Herdsman3个软件育种值估计的比较[J].中国畜牧杂志,2017,53(7):29-35,7.

基金项目

国家生猪产业技术体系(CARS-36) (CARS-36)

北京市科技计划项目(D151100004615004),浙江畜禽育种专项(2016C02054-5) (D151100004615004)

中国畜牧杂志

OA北大核心CSTPCD

0258-7033

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文