| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国药房|吲达帕胺分别联用3种降压药治疗2级原发性高血压的疗效和安全性比较

吲达帕胺分别联用3种降压药治疗2级原发性高血压的疗效和安全性比较

杨红芳 程昌盛 程冬瑀

中国药房2017,Vol.28Issue(21):2933-2936,4.
中国药房2017,Vol.28Issue(21):2933-2936,4.DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2017.21.15

吲达帕胺分别联用3种降压药治疗2级原发性高血压的疗效和安全性比较

Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Indapamide Combined with 3 Anti-hypertension Drugs for Grade 2 Essential Hypertension

杨红芳 1程昌盛 1程冬瑀1

作者信息

  • 1. 广西壮族自治区桂东人民医院内科,广西梧州 543001
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To compare therapeutic efficacy and safety of indapamide separately combined with benazepril,irbe-sartan or amlodipine for grade 2 essential hypertension(EH). METHODS:A total of 150 patients with grade 2 EH were randomly divided into benazepril group(50 cases),irbesartan group(50 cases)and amlodipine group(50 cases). 3 groups were given Indap-amide tablet 2.5 mg orally,once a day. Benazepril group was additionally given Benazepril hydrochloride tablet 10 mg orally,once a day;irbesartan group was additionally given Irbesartan tablet 150 mg orally,once a day;amlodipine group was additionally giv-en Amlodipine tablet 5 mg orally,once a day. 3 groups were treated for 12 weeks. The levels of systolic pressure,diastolic pres-sure,heart rate,total cholesterol(TC),three triacylglycerol(TG)and serum potassium as well as the occurrence of ADR were ob-served in 3 groups before and after treatment. RESULTS:The total response rate of berazopril group,irbesartar group and a mloelip-ire group had no significant difference(90.0% vs. 88.0% vs. 92.0%,P>0.05). There were no statistical significances in the levels of systolic pressure,diastolic pressure,heart rate,TC,TG and serum potassium among 3 groups before treatment(P>0.05). Af-ter treatment,systolic pressure and diastolic pressure of 3 groups were significantly lower than before,with statistical significance (P<0.01);but there was no statistical significance among 3 groups(P>0.05). There were no statistical significance in heart rate, TC,TG of 3 groups before and after treatment and the level of serum potassium in benazepril group and irbesartan group (P>0.05). After treatment,the level of serum potassium in amlodipine group was significantly lower than before,with statistical signifi-cance (P<0.05). The incidence of ADR in irbesartan group was significantly lower than benazepril group and amlodipine group, with statistical significance (P<0.05);but there was no statistical significance between benazepril group and amlodipine group (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The indapamide separately combined with benazepril,irbesartan or amlodipine have similar therapeu-tic efficacy for grade 2 EH,but the safety of irbesartan is better than those of benazepril and amlodipine.

关键词

吲达帕胺/贝那普利/厄贝沙坦/氨氯地平/原发性高血压/疗效/安全性

Key words

Indapamide/Benazepril/Irbesartan/Amlodipine/Essential pressure/Therapeutic efficacy/Safety

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

杨红芳,程昌盛,程冬瑀..吲达帕胺分别联用3种降压药治疗2级原发性高血压的疗效和安全性比较[J].中国药房,2017,28(21):2933-2936,4.

中国药房

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1001-0408

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文