湖北医药学院学报2017，Vol.36Issue(3)：239-241,3.DOI:10.13819/j.issn.1006-9674.2017.03.011
HHFNC与nCPAP治疗早产低出生体重儿呼吸暂停的疗效比较
Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHFNC) and nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) in the Treatment of Apnea in Preterm Infants
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the treatment of apnea in low birth weight preterm infants.Methods 90 preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal apnea in our hospital from June 2015 to December 2015 were randomly divided into the HH-FNC group and the nCPAP group.The infants in HHFNC group were treated with humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy on the basis of drug therapy,and the infants in nCPAP group were treated by CPAP aerating the congested nose on the basis of drug therapy.Results The total effective rate of the HHFNC group was obviously higher thanthat of the nCPAP group,which was significantly different(P＜0.05).There were no statistically significant differences between the twvo groups in the need for re-support of mechanical ventilation due to apnea (P＞0.05).The incidences of nasal injury and abdominal distension in the nCPAP group were obviously more than those in the HHFNC group,and the difference was significantly different(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence of the respiratory tract infection between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion HHFNC can effectively improve apnea in low birth weight preterm infants.HHFNG is worth popularizing because it has less damage and is easy to be accepted by children.关键词
湿化、高流量鼻导管通气/早产低出生体重儿/呼吸暂停Key words
Humidified high flow nasal cannula/Low birth weight preterm infants/Apnea引用本文复制引用
张冷..HHFNC与nCPAP治疗早产低出生体重儿呼吸暂停的疗效比较[J].湖北医药学院学报,2017,36(3):239-241,3.基金项目
湖北省荆门市科技计划项目(2015S03) （2015S03）
