| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国实用内科杂志|咖啡酸片治疗免疫性血小板减少症有效性和安全性随机双盲平行对照多中心临床研究

咖啡酸片治疗免疫性血小板减少症有效性和安全性随机双盲平行对照多中心临床研究

中国咖啡酸片多中心研究小组

中国实用内科杂志2017,Vol.37Issue(9):817-821,5.
中国实用内科杂志2017,Vol.37Issue(9):817-821,5.DOI:10.19538/jnk2017090108

咖啡酸片治疗免疫性血小板减少症有效性和安全性随机双盲平行对照多中心临床研究

A randomized, double-blind multicentre clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Caffeic acid for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in China

中国咖啡酸片多中心研究小组1

作者信息

  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Caffeic acid tablets (CA) in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).Method 120 patients with ITP were randomly divided into two groups:trial group and control group with 60 patients in each group.Trial group A receives(0.3 g CA 3 times daily) and Control group B receives(placebo 3 times daffy for 4 weeks.Safety indicators:(1) Vital signs,blood routine tests,liver & kidney function assays,electrocardiogram (ECG) and the incidence of adverse events (AE).(2)Therapeutic indexes:(1) Major response effects:the platelet count,platelet transfusion amount,platelet recovery reaction time,effectiveness (complete response rate (CR) + response rate (R)) were compared between two groups.(2) Minor response effects:to use Kaplan Meier method was used to describe process of platelet count recovery to up to 80 × 109/L,and 100 × 109/L,and platelet count increase time needed for reaching to absolute value 50 × 109/L or higher (per day) in two groups.(3) Data analysis:EP 13.0 was used.For comparison of incidence of adverse events between two groups,Fisher's exact probability method was used.AE and lab tests before and after study were also listed.Results Comparison beween group A and group B shows,the major response effects (CR + R) were 41.82% and 14.81% (FAS) or 44.00% and 15.35% (PPS);P =0.001.There was significant difference in platelet response with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) is 27% [10.89%~43.12%] (FAS),or28% [11.72%~45.51%] (PPS).Both group A and group B had no platelet transfusion.Platelet recovery reaction time (median time) in group A and group B were 17.00 and 34.00 (FAS) or 15.00 and 34.00 (PPS).Comparison between two groups of patients shows,the CR rate + R rate had statistically significant difference (P<0.05).Group A had no obvious adverse event.Conclusion In ITP CA resulted in good response effect,low adverse events rate and reliable safety.

关键词

免疫性血小板减少症/咖啡酸片/安慰剂/药物有效性与安全性/多中心研究

Key words

immune thrombocytopenia/caffeic acid tablet/placebo/efficacy and safety/clinical trial

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

中国咖啡酸片多中心研究小组..咖啡酸片治疗免疫性血小板减少症有效性和安全性随机双盲平行对照多中心临床研究[J].中国实用内科杂志,2017,37(9):817-821,5.

中国实用内科杂志

OACSCDCSTPCD

1005-2194

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文