| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床口腔医学杂志|超声骨刀拔除下颌阻生智齿临床效果的Meta分析

超声骨刀拔除下颌阻生智齿临床效果的Meta分析

张卓 卢华 张小冬 章宏毅

临床口腔医学杂志2017,Vol.33Issue(10):616-620,5.
临床口腔医学杂志2017,Vol.33Issue(10):616-620,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2017.10.012

超声骨刀拔除下颌阻生智齿临床效果的Meta分析

The clinical effect of using or combining with Piezosurgery in pulling out of mandibular impacted teeth:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails

张卓 1卢华 1张小冬 1章宏毅2

作者信息

  • 1. 松滋市人民医院口腔科 湖北 荆州 434200
  • 2. 长江大学附属第一人民医院口腔科 湖北 荆州 434000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of the use of Piezosurgery in pulling out of mandibular impacted teeth by performing a meta-analysis. Methods:The date up to June 1,2017 were collected by searching in PubMed,CBM, CNKI,VIP database,and Wanfang database for using or combining with Piezosurgery and traditional method to pull out of mandibular impacted teeth the clinical effect. After data extraction and quality evaluation,a meta-analysis was carried out with RevMan 5. 3 software. Results:There were 9 literatures,671 in the experimental group and 678 in the control group. Meta-a-nalysis results show that the application of Piezosurgery to pull out of mandibular impacted teeth and the traditional hammer chisel split crown method or simple high speed turbine in operation time(RR= -17. 73,95%CI= -14. 61~ -12. 85,P<0. 001),postoperative swelling(RR=0. 76,95%CI=0. 64~0. 90,P=0. 002),limited mouth opening(RR=0. 47,95%CI=0. 32~0. 70,P=0. 0002),there were significant differences. Conclusion:The clinical effect of using Piezosurgery to pull out of mandibular impacted teeth is better than the traditional hammer chipping or simple high speed turbine method.

关键词

超声骨刀/下颌阻生智齿/Meta分析

Key words

Piezosurgery/Mandibular impacted teeth/Meta-analysis

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

张卓,卢华,张小冬,章宏毅..超声骨刀拔除下颌阻生智齿临床效果的Meta分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2017,33(10):616-620,5.

临床口腔医学杂志

OACSTPCD

1003-1634

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文