| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国内镜杂志|经尿道Peel-away鞘输尿管镜与经尿道输尿管镜治疗膀胱结石的疗效比较

经尿道Peel-away鞘输尿管镜与经尿道输尿管镜治疗膀胱结石的疗效比较

郭亮 段俊锋 李东杰 谷杰 蒲安明 欧阳健 张晓波

中国内镜杂志2017,Vol.23Issue(10):26-30,5.
中国内镜杂志2017,Vol.23Issue(10):26-30,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2017.10.006

经尿道Peel-away鞘输尿管镜与经尿道输尿管镜治疗膀胱结石的疗效比较

Efficacy between ureteroscopic via urethral Peel-away sheath and transurethral ureteroscopy in treating bladder calculi:A comparative study

郭亮 1段俊锋 2李东杰 1谷杰 1蒲安明 2欧阳健 2张晓波1

作者信息

  • 1. 中南大学湘雅医院 国际医疗部,湖南 长沙 410008
  • 2. 湖南省株洲市三三一医院 泌尿外科,湖南 株洲 412008
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the effectiveness of ureteroscopic via urethral Peel-away sheath and transurethral ureteroscopy in treatment of bladder calculi. Methods Clinical data of 76 cases of bladder calculi patients were collected from January 2013 to December 2015. All the patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A was performed by ureteroscopic lithotripsy via urethral Peel-away sheath (n = 45). Group B was transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy (n = 31). Results 76 cases of bladder calculi were successfully treated by one-time lithotripsy. Lithotripsy time: group A was (17.8 ± 5.9) min, group B was (22.7 ± 8.3) min (t = 2.96, P = 0.004); stone clearance time: group A (12.6 ± 4.9) min, group B (24.5 ± 5.3) min (t = 9.90, P = 0.000);Intraoperative urethral mucosa injury : group A (1.0 ± 0.5), group B (2.1 ± 0.4) (t = 9.47, P = 0.000); VAS score:group A (1.9 ± 0.6), group B (2.6 ± 0.6) points (t = 4.72, P = 0.000); indwelling catheter time: group A (1.0 ± 0.2) d, B group (1.4 ± 0.9) d (t = 2.59, P = 0.012); There was no significant difference in hospitalization expense, group A was (7437.4 ± 356.7), group B was (7296.8 ± 333.8) (t = -1.73, P = 0.087). There were no complications such as hemorrhage, perforation and rupture of the 2 groups, without convertion to open surgery either. After the treatment of oral antibiotic, 1 case of postoperative urinary tract infection was cured in group B. In our study, case of postoperative urinary retention was 1 in group A, versus 5 in group B, with statistical difference (χ2 = 6.43, P = 0.011). Follow up: 13 patients were lost to follow-up, the other patients were followed up for 6 ~ 12 months. There was 1 case of elderly male patient with urinary retention due to BPH in each of the 2 groups, the other patients had no recurrence of calculus. By analyzing the statistical results, it was found that the experimental group had obvious advantages over the control group in the lithotripsy time, stone clearance time, urethral mucosa injury, postoperative pain and postoperative indwelling catheter time. Conclusion There is no significant difference in efficacy of the treatment of bladder calculi between ureteroscopic via urethral Peel-away sheath and transurethral ureteroscopy. However, our study shows the Peel-away ureteroscopy has the advantages of shorter lithotripsy time, shorter time of stone clearance and less injury of urethra mucosa menbrane, there was no significant difference in operation cost between two groups. Therefore, Ureteroscopic via urethral Peel-away sheath is an effective method for endoscopic bladder lithotripsy.

关键词

膀胱结石/Peel-away鞘/经尿道/输尿管镜

Key words

bladder calculi/peel-away sheath/transurethral/ureteroscope

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

郭亮,段俊锋,李东杰,谷杰,蒲安明,欧阳健,张晓波..经尿道Peel-away鞘输尿管镜与经尿道输尿管镜治疗膀胱结石的疗效比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2017,23(10):26-30,5.

中国内镜杂志

OACSTPCD

1007-1989

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文