摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect of one-time radical correction and incision-thread-drawing procedure for treating infantile iatrogenic anal fistula. Methods Totally 96 cases of infantile anal fistula in our hospital from January 2013 to March 2016 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, 48 cases in each group. The thread-drawing group was treated with incision-thread-drawing procedure of anal fistula, while the radical group was treated with one-time radical correction. Results The effective rate in the thread-drawing group was 81. 25%, which was significantly lower than 95. 83% in the radical group(χ2=5. 031, P <0. 05). During the treatment, the incidence rate of incision infection in the thread-drawing group was 22. 92%, which was significantly higher than 6. 25% in the radical group (χ2=5. 352, P < 0. 05 ) . There was no difference in the incidence rate of bleeding, anal incontinence and defect between the two groups ( P > 0. 05 ) . Conclusion Compared with the incision-thread-drawing procedure of anal fistula, the cu-rative effect of one-time radical correction in the treatment of infantile iatrogenic anal fistula is obvious, the postoperative complications and long-term recurrence rate are lower.关键词
一次性根治术/肛瘘切开挂线术/婴幼儿/医源性肛瘘Key words
one-time radical correction/incision-thread-drawing procedure of anal fistula/infants/iatrogenic anal fistula分类
医药卫生
