| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国医院用药评价与分析|缬沙坦与依那普利分别治疗慢性心力衰竭的系统评价

缬沙坦与依那普利分别治疗慢性心力衰竭的系统评价

冯名海 储文功 董胜利

中国医院用药评价与分析2017,Vol.17Issue(10):1379-1383,5.
中国医院用药评价与分析2017,Vol.17Issue(10):1379-1383,5.DOI:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2017.10.031

缬沙坦与依那普利分别治疗慢性心力衰竭的系统评价

Meta-analysis on Efficacy of Valsartan and Enalapril in Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure

冯名海 1储文功 2董胜利1

作者信息

  • 1. 解放军第181医院一五八临床部,广西柳州 545006
  • 2. 第二军医大学药学院,上海 200433
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the clinical safety and efficacy of valsartan and enalapril in treatment of chronic heart failure , so as to provide reference for the clinical drug use .METHODS:Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang database were retrieved for RCTs of valsartan and enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure .Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3.RESULTS:Totally 14 literatures were involved , including 1665 patients with chronic heart failure .According to Meta-analysis , there were no significant differences between valsartan and enalapril group in changes of the total number of valid cases , left ventricular ejection fraction , left ventricular diastolic internal diameter or volume and left ventricular systolic end-stage or volume(P>0.05).The incidence of adverse drug reactions in valsartan group was significantly lower than that of enalapril group, with statistically significant difference (RR=0.45,95%CI=0.31-0.66,P<0.01).CONCLUSIONS:Current evidence shows that valsartan and enalapril have the same effect in treatment of chronic heart failure , yet valsartan is better than enalapril in the safety .

关键词

缬沙坦/依那普利/慢性心力衰竭/荟萃分析

Key words

Valsartan/Enalapril/Chronic heart failure/Meta-analysis

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

冯名海,储文功,董胜利..缬沙坦与依那普利分别治疗慢性心力衰竭的系统评价[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2017,17(10):1379-1383,5.

中国医院用药评价与分析

OACSTPCD

1672-2124

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文